I finally have my cup of coffee going.  I was up until 5:00 am last 
night, and 4:00 am night before last, looking over my options and 
reading router reviews.  I've connected my TRENDnet Print Server to my 
old Linksys WRT54GS using wireless.  This freed a RJ45 fast Ethernet 
port on the WRT54GS router, which I promptly connected to my 
web/mail/postgres server.

I've decided to focus on wireless going forward.  The new wireless 
802.11 N runs at up to 300Mbps over both the 2.4GHZ and 5GHz radio 
frequencies, which is three times faster than 100Mbps wired fast 
Ethernet.  The older 802.11 G wi-fi only ran at 54GHz.  With the 
improvement in speed using  802.11n, I think it's time to start thinking 
wireless.

Below is a link on the importance between the 2.4GHz and 5GHz radio 
frequencies, as it applies to the new wireless N 802.11 Standard:

http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/6581/1/

I narrowed my choices down to the routers listed below:  Any feedback, 
including personal preferences, are welcome.

1) Netgear WNR3500L

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122334&Tpk=WNR3500L

2)  Netgear WNDR3700

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122326&Tpk=WNDR3700

3)  SonicWALL TZ 100 N

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=SonicWALL+TZ+100&x=0&y=0

4)  FVS336G.  I would up link my WRT54GS into it for 802.11G 54Mbps 
2.4GHz wireless connection.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833122213&cm_re=FVS336G-_-33-122-213-_-Product

Regards,

LelandJ






On 10/16/2010 05:49 PM, Michael Madigan wrote:
> If I have a cable router with eight 10/100 megabit ports and I take one port 
> and I connect it to the uplink of a Gigabit switch.
>
> Then off that gigabit switch I connect two workstations which both have 
> gigabit network cards.
>
> The two workstations on the gigabit switch will be able to transfer data 
> between each other at gigabit speeds even though the router is 100 mbits and 
> they won't be able to transfer data to the rest of the network at gigabit 
> speeds.
>
> Is this correct?
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4cbb29cf.8090...@mail.smvfp.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to