Well you went 1 for 5 in that list, for me anyway. Besides, I hate being lumped into any group but I'm sure that makes it much easier for your pea-brain to comprehend.
As for global warming denial, might have something to do with the fallacy that surrounds the concept. Stop and consider that for a moment. ::michael On 1/26/2011 10:05 AM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > On 26/01/2011 02:10 p.m., Michael Oke, II wrote: >> Yes, it is but it would take far more intelligence than you are in >> possession of to understand that. >> >> Not sure whom you mean by "you people" but please, tell me what your >> country is doing to conserve energy? >> >> Again, your attempts to draw parallels is weak but nothing more is >> expected. >> > > Now you are mixing threads. > "you people" would mean USA in the other thread we are having right now. > But not in this one. Here it means people like you, MadAgain, Theisen, > etc. That would be ...... semi fascist, ultra right wing, low IQ, > republican red necks? (though it beats me **why** would those things and > global warming denial be associated, they seem to be, in this list at least) > > >> On 1/26/2011 9:01 AM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: >>> On 26/01/2011 12:36 p.m., Michael Oke, II wrote: >>>> Smart enough to know that the comparison that you are weakly attempting >>>> to draw is asinine at best. >>>> >>> Is it? >>> In both cases there is not enough time to ascertain a certain behaviour >>> (car crashing/global warming) before being harmed by the results of that >>> behaviour. In both cases the sensible action is to take measures just in >>> case the behaviour turns to the worse case. >>> It really surprises me when you people that are so quick to take >>> defensive measures when it comes up to killing other people, and make up >>> such terms as "preemptive war", "preventive war", "defensive war", >>> "defensive attack", etc. etc., are so reluctant to take similar >>> defensive measures when it comes up to giving life to other >>> people/species. It seems it's ok to kill just in case, but it's not ok >>> to bother to save energy just in case..... weird people that you are. >>> > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
