I think I read somewhere that the original Foxbase code, while perhaps elegant and certainly worthy of performance awards, was extremely easy to break...at least parts of it.
Mike >>> Pretty sure VB.net is a different animal from VB6. Much like VFP and FPW >>> were vastly different.<< > FPW/VFP vastly different? Yes there are big differences, but the fact remains > that code from FoxBase+ resides in the VFP > 9 SP2 codebase. It is one of the reasons the development team was so > reluctant to change the Report Designer for so many > years. > > Rick > White Light Computing, Inc. > > www.whitelightcomputing.com > www.swfox.net > www.rickschummer.com > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4dd5950f.5080...@ggisoft.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
