Actually I was trying to say 3rd which is why it said 2rd... As for the rest
of your statement, I agree totally. I try to learn a little of everything I
can so if need be, I can switch to whatever fits best.

John


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Rick Schummer
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NF] CoffeeScript as a high level alternative to programming in
Javascript

>> I think they are more sinister than just reactionary. They embrace, 
>> absorb/assimilate and overcome. Usually by their
2rd iteration they have it down to a usable product and because of the size
of their crowd, they become the market. That doesn't really bother me, it's
just all the turbulence that they and other vendors bring.<<

You are generous with your "2nd iteration". I always feel it takes Microsoft
three tries to get things right.

As for the turbulence you mention, it not only affects the other vendors
(sometimes positive, sometimes negative), but it is putting consulting and
IT shops in a bad position, and in the case of more than a few, out of
business. I have seen several consulting companies buy in 100% to some
"strategy" and watched Microsoft throw it away. In the process the
consulting company goes through bankruptcy because of the investment. Sad as
this might be, this is something I believe the heads in Redmond never
consider and do not care about. On the flip side, the people in the trenches
at Microsoft who have formed the relationships with the community do care.
Two sides of the beast.

This is one reason I refuse to allow my company to be focused on only one
customer, and why I refuse to invest into one future technology from one
vendor.

Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.

www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to