I'm attempting to implement a particular solution for one of our clients. Part of our systems - the EDI stuff - its all done WITHOUT CDX files - which absolutely Drives Me Nuts! My Boss claims he complained about it years ago - but said the other main programmer from years ago REFUSED to make the change from IDX to CDX - claiming it was TOO Complicated (to change TOO Many programs for TOO Many clients I suspect was the main complication).
So - I'm looking to make an update - to one DBF - that uses multiple IDX files. To solve a particular problem - I am looking to create a CDX for that DBF file - but, for only ONE New Index - but, still have the main system keep using the older IDX files as well. I was initially assuming that this was completely Viable to do - to have both a CDX attached to a DBF - and ALSO Still use the Older IDX files. Although - last night - when I was doing initial testing - I ran into a problem. I haven't finished analyzing the problem yet - but, was wondering if its due to the CDX vs. IDX and that BOTH can NOT be used on a DBF at the Same time! Can anyone Confirm or Deny this??? I'm under pressure to solve a HUGE EDI problem for a client that is causing BIG Chargebacks - and they Just reported yet Another occurrence of More chargebacks this morning - and the client is freaking out. And, of course, folks here are putting the pressure on me to solve the problem PRONTO! Thanks, -K- Senior Developer Waitex Information System, Inc. P Save a tree. Don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
