An interesting and potentially useful ambiguity here is that process"0 (1+i.2)
conceptually (as I understand it) processes the two arguments simultaneously but actually processes them serially as it is written in Raul's example. One reason this is interesting is that you could write "process" to spin off a separate J instance for each argument if you wanted to process them in parallel. Though you would be spinning off the processes serially, if each argument takes enough time to process- more time than it takes to advance to the next argument - you would effectively have parallel processing going on. On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM, pascha <amirpasha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks.. "row_number" works >> But now the problem is I want the verb to iterate over one array at a time. >> for example if I do proccess"0(1+i.2) the resultant input is: ... -- Devon McCormick, CFA ^me^ at acm. org is my preferred e-mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
