You were right It was my misunderstanding.. Done!
Raul Miller-4 wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM, pascha <amirpasha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks.. "row_number" works >> But now the problem is I want the verb to iterate over one array at a >> time. >> for example if I do proccess"0(1+i.2) the resultant input is: >> >> /home/user/input/filename1.pgm >> /home/user/input/filename2.pgm > > Not exactly. The input is: > 1 2 > > And process runs independently for each of those two items. > > So '/home/user/input/filename1.pgm' and > '/home/user/input/filename2.pgm' do not exist together in the same > instance of process"0. > >> what I want is to "separately" process each array. In the first iteration >> I >> want it to go for >> >> /home/user/input/filename1.pgm >> and when the process finished for the first iteration it goes for the >> second >> one: >> /home/user/input/filename2.pgm >> and etc. like a loop. > > That's what my original code does. > >> I changed what you've wrote little bit: >> >> process=: 3 :0 >> index =. > y >> input=. '/home/filename',":index >> input=. input,'.pgm' >> input >> ) >> >> process"0(,.<"1 ,.(i.2)) >> >> but still doesn't go for one array at a time, did you get what I mean? > > It does indeed go for one array at a time. > > The issue here is that you have changed the mechanism so the result of > the process is the input file name. And the results are preserved, so > they exist simultaneously. > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/path-variable-in-loop-tp34413608s24193p34420280.html Sent from the J Programming mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
