In the jqt session with ASCII boxes

(< '  '),~  each (< '  ' ) ,  each  8 8$  u: 9800+(|.(8$23),20 22 21 18 19
21 22 20),(32$(8$29 32),8$32 29),(8$17),14 16 15 13 12 15 16 14
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|  ♜  |  ♞  |  ♝  |  ♛  |  ♚  |  ♝  |  ♞  |  ♜  |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|  ♟  |  ♟  |  ♟  |  ♟  |  ♟  |  ♟  |  ♟  |  ♟  |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |  ♨  |  ♥  |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|  ♙  |  ♙  |  ♙  |  ♙  |  ♙  |  ♙  |  ♙  |  ♙  |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
|  ♖  |  ♘  |  ♗  |  ♕  |  ♔  |  ♗  |  ♘  |  ♖  |
+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+

and ordinary boxes

   (< '  '),~  each (< '  ' ) ,  each  8 8$  u: 9800+(|.(8$23),20 22 21 18
19 21 22 20),(32$(8$29 32),8$32 29),(8$17),14 16 15 13 12 15 16 14
┌───────┬───────┬───────┬───────┬───────┬───────┬───────┬───────┐
│  ♜  │  ♞  │  ♝  │  ♛  │  ♚  │  ♝  │  ♞  │  ♜  │
├───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┤
│  ♟  │  ♟  │  ♟  │  ♟  │  ♟  │  ♟  │  ♟  │  ♟  │
├───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┤
│  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │
├───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┤
│  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │
├───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┤
│  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │
├───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┤
│  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │  ♨  │  ♥  │
├───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┤
│  ♙  │  ♙  │  ♙  │  ♙  │  ♙  │  ♙  │  ♙  │  ♙  │
├───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┼───────┤
│  ♖  │  ♘  │  ♗  │  ♕  │  ♔  │  ♗  │  ♘  │  ♖  │
└───────┴───────┴───────┴───────┴───────┴───────┴───────┴───────┘

The boxes not that well aligned

Flat it out again not too bad:

8 40 $  ;  (< '  '),~  each (< '  ' ) ,  each  8 8$  u: 9800+(|.(8$23),20
22 21 18 19 21 22 20),(32$(8$29 32),8$32 29),(8$17),14 16 15 13 12 15 16 14

  ♜    ♞    ♝    ♛    ♚    ♝    ♞    ♜
  ♟    ♟    ♟    ♟    ♟    ♟    ♟    ♟
  ♥    ♨    ♥    ♨    ♥    ♨    ♥    ♨
  ♨    ♥    ♨    ♥    ♨    ♥    ♨    ♥
  ♥    ♨    ♥    ♨    ♥    ♨    ♥    ♨
  ♨    ♥    ♨    ♥    ♨    ♥    ♨    ♥
  ♙    ♙    ♙    ♙    ♙    ♙    ♙    ♙
  ♖    ♘    ♗    ♕    ♔    ♗    ♘    ♖
On 1 Jan 2015 21:32, "Björn Helgason" <[email protected]> wrote:

>  It is not that easy to get ok black and white squares that look and align
> well.
>
>   8 8$  u: 9800+(|.(8$23),20 22 21 18 19 21 22 20),(32$(8$29 32),8$32
> 29),(8$17),14 16 15 13 12 15 16 14
>
> ♜♞♝♛♚♝♞♜
> ♟♟♟♟♟♟♟♟
> ♥♨♥♨♥♨♥♨
> ♨♥♨♥♨♥♨♥
> ♥♨♥♨♥♨♥♨
> ♨♥♨♥♨♥♨♥
> ♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙
> ♖♘♗♕♔♗♘♖
> I tried numerous different fonts on J802 and found the dice characters
> displaying only with "Deja Vu Sans", "Deja Vu Sans Condensed", "Deja Vu
> Sans Mono", and "Unifont".  I'm surprised that Courier and "Courier New"
> let me down.  This is too bad because Unifont is the only fixed-width font
> that shows the dice and I don't really like the way it looks.
>
> I'm also a little surprised that unicode does not give us very similar
> results across different systems.
>
> Interestingly, my jconsole under emacs seems to have no problem with the
>  dice or the chess pieces which, as Pascal pointed out, could be rendered
> in proper starting position like this:
>    8 8$  u: 9800+(|.(8$23),20 22 21 18 19 21 22 20),(32$_9768),(8$17),14 16
> 15 13 12 15 16 14
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 5:12 PM, robert therriault <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > They work for me on j803 jhs with courier as the font.
> >
> >    u: 9857
> > ⚁
> >
> > Cheers, bob
> >
> > On Dec 31, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Björn Helgason <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I use plain jqt on Android
> > > On 31 Dec 2014 20:12, "Skip Cave" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> The unicode characters 9856-9861 (hex 2680-2685) don't have the dice
> > >> characters on any of the fonts I tried in jqt64-j803 on my Win 8.1
> > machine.
> > >> Any idea what fonts might have he dice characters?
> > >>
> > >> Skip
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Björn Helgason <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> It all depends on what font is used.
> > >>>
> > >>> Many/most only have subsets of the pictures/fonts/bitmaps/signs for
> the
> > >>> unicode places.
> > >>>
> > >>> http://unicode-table.com/en/
> > >>>
> > >>> press a sign and it will give a popup with the unicode number/name
> > >>> On 31 Dec 2014 11:25, "Linda Alvord" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> u: 9856+i. 6 results in 6 empty boxes?  I had no trouble getting
> chess
> > >>>> pieces.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I tried (jqt font size 16)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> u:200 50$i.10000
> > >>>>
> > >>>> and don't see any dice.  Any ideas? Theree are many symbols but also
> > >> many
> > >>>> boxes.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Linda
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> > >>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Björn
> Helgason
> > >>>> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 12:40 PM
> > >>>> To: Programming forum
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Repeated rolling dice
> > >>>>
> > >>>> To display the dice:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> u: 9856+i. 6
> > >>>> ⚀⚁⚂⚃⚄⚅
> > >>>>
> > >>>> u: 9855+5 1 4 1 5 2 2 6 2 4 5 6 1 3 6 2 1 4 4 2 ⚄⚀⚃⚀⚄⚁⚁⚅⚁⚃⚄⚅⚀⚂⚅⚁⚀⚃⚃⚁
> > On
> > >>> 29
> > >>>> Dec 2014 11:15, "Linda Alvord" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> After reading this thread from September, I couldn't resist an
> > >>>>> "elementary school" version, shown twice below:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   f=: 13 :'>:?y$6'
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   ]A=:f 20                                     NB. Original rolls
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 5 1 4 1 5 2 2 6 2 4 5 6 1 3 6 2 1 4 4 2
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   }:1,6~:A
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   ]B=:(}:1,6~:A)<;.1 A                        NB. Boxes show extra
> > >>> rolls
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --T-T-T-T-T-T-T---T-T-T---T-T---T-T-T-T-┐
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> │5│1│4│1│5│2│2│6 2│4│5│6 1│3│6 2│1│4│4│2│
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> L-+-+-+-+-+-+-+---+-+-+---+-+---+-+-+-+--
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   ]C=:+/"1 >B                                 NB. Value of rolls
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 5 1 4 1 5 2 2 8 4 5 7 3 8 1 4 4 2
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   $C                                          NB. Usable answers
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 17
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   f=: 13 :'>:?y$6'
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   ]A=:f 20                                    NB. Original rolls
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 1 2 6 6 6 5 3 5 1 6 6 3 1 4 2 6 4 1 2 2
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   }:1,6~:A
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   ]B=:(}:1,6~:A)<;.1 A                        NB. Boxes show extra
> > >>> rolls
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --T-T-------T-T-T-T-----T-T-T-T---T-T-T-┐
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> │1│2│6 6 6 5│3│5│1│6 6 3│1│4│2│6 4│1│2│2│
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> L-+-+-------+-+-+-+-----+-+-+-+---+-+-+--
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   ]C=:+/"1 >B                                 NB. Value of rolls
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 1 2 23 3 5 1 15 1 4 2 10 1 2 2
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>    $C                                          NB. Usable answers
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 14
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Linda
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>> From: [email protected]
> > >>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Raul
> > >>>>> Miller
> > >>>>> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 11:50 PM
> > >>>>> To: Programming forum
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Repeated rolling dice
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> In addition to Pascal's comments, "0 can sometimes run into an
> issue
> > >>>>> with word formation rules (when the argument to the right begins
> > >> with a
> > >>>> number).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Raul
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Johann Hibschman <
> > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks, that's helpful, although the tacit version of "bulk" is a
> > >>>>>> bit
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> too much for me to parse.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I imagine factor of 2 helps because it gets you over the expected
> > >>>>>> 6r5
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> rolls per "game", assuming I did that recurrence right
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> (e=(5r6*1)+1r6*(1+e)).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I do have some lingering style questions though:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> 1. It looks to me like David Lambert's solution used both (&>) and
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> (">) to force a verb to apply to the atoms, which I would write
> > >> ("0).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Are there any particular reasons to prefer one over the other?
> ("0)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> may require a ([) to avoid merging with a follow-up literal, (&>)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> seems a little like exploiting a side-effect of (>), and (">)
> could
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> just as easily be ("+) or any other 0 0 0 verb.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2. Is there any difference between (bind) and (@:)? They look to
> me
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> like they would be identical.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Johann
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Raul Miller <
> > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> That is very close to what I came up with, for the case where we
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> want
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> only
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> a single value from our result:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>   d6=:1 + ? bind 6
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>   repd6=: [:+/(,d6)^:(6={:)@d6
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Here's a variation on Roger Hui's approach, for the case where we
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> want N values from our result:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> d6s=: 1 + [: ? #&6
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> bulk=:{.#&0(],~(+/;.1~1:}:@,0~:6&|)@(],d6s@[))^:(
> > >>>>> <mailto:0=6&;|@%7b:@%7b.)%5e:_~> 0=6&|@{:@{.)^:_~]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Example use:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>   bulk 20
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 5 5 5 4 3 3 2 3 3 9 1 4 16 3 3 1 3 17 3 4
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This would probably be much clearer if implemented explicitly
> > >>>>>>> rather
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> than tacitly, and probably would be more efficient also. So:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> bulkd6s=:3 :0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>  r=. i. 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>  while. y >: #r do.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>    r=. r, d6s y
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>    mask=. }: 1, 0~:6|r
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>    r=. mask +/;.1 r
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>  end.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>  y{.r
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> )
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> But statistically speaking, this is still not as efficient as it
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> be.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I think we'd do better with:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> bulkd6=:3 :0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>  r=. i. 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>  while. y >: #r do.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>    r=. r, d6s 2*y
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>    mask=. }: 1, 0~:6|r
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>    r=. mask +/;.1 r
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>  end.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>  y{.r
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> )
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Do you see why this tends to be more efficient?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Raul
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:50 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
> > >>>>>>> <
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> this works
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> (, >:@?@6:)^:((0=#) +. 6={:)^:_ i.0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>   ([: +/ (, >:@?@6:)^:((0=#) +. 6={:)^:_) i.0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 11
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> From: Johann Hibschman < <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >>>>> [email protected]>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> To: Programming forum < <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >>>>> [email protected]>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Cc:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 9:06 AM
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Subject: [Jprogramming] Repeated rolling dice
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> For fun, I've been running some statistics for a game with an
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> unusual rule for rolling dice: if a 6 is rolled, roll again and
> > >>>>>>>> add
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> the result, repeating on any subsequent 6s. I wanted to
> > >> implement
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> this in J, collecting all the individual rolls (rather than just
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> the sum.)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> It seems like there should be a more clever and elegant way to
> > >> do
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> this, but this is what I have:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> NB. Simple roll.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> roll0 =: >:@?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> NB. This seems to work, but it's not very clever.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> roll =: 3 : 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  r =. >:?y
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  if. r=y do. r=. r,(roll y) end.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  r
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> )
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> NB. Attempt at iterating via power.  Fails because repeats NB.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> signal termination.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> roll0^:(6&=)^:(<_) 6
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> NB. Attempt at iterating via agenda.  Not even close yet.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> NB. ]`(]+$:) @. (=&6)  NB. where to stick in the roll?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> This gives what I expect:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>   roll"0 ] 10#6
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 6 1 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 3 0 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 3 0 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2 0 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 5 0 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2 0 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 6 6 2
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2 0 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 1 0 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 6 3 0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> But is there a better way to do this? Also, are there any known
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> issues with the RNG? I've not gathered enough statistics to
> > >> prove
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> it, but the results look clumpier (more identical values in a
> > >>>>>>>> row)
> > >>>>> than
> > >>>>> I expect.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Now, I know that's a common cognitive bias, so it may just be
> > >> me,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> but is there a discussion of the quality of the RNG somewhere?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Johann
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --- For information about J forums see
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
> > >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --- For information about J forums see
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
> > >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -- For information about J forums see
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
> > >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> For information about J forums see
> > >>>>>> <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> For information about J forums see
> > >>>>> <http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm>
> > >>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> For information about J forums see
> > >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> For information about J forums see
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> For information about J forums see
> > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >>>
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Devon McCormick, CFA
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to