the notation name_a$b$c_ is a syntactic sugar, there is actually no nest locale. Just as in java, there are no inner class in bytecode level.
Пт, 07 апр 2017, jprogramming написал(а): > To clarify the nested locale problem, > > if a is an instanced (numbered locale) object within the 'far' locale, and > has member b, you canoot do > > b__a_far_. > > The workaround that I have used is to modify coclass such that it creates a > member in the 'OOP' locale. > > > far_OOP- =: <'far' > > so now you can access nested as, > > b__a__far__OOP > > The first syntax would be preferable. I don't see much of a need for > non-instanced locales within other locales. ie, a far (non instanced non > numbered) locale within base locale > > > a_far_base_ NB. not really needed. > ________________________________ > From: bill lam <bbill....@gmail.com> > To: programm...@jsoftware.com > Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 11:51 AM > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] locales with adverbs and conjunctions? > > > nest locale is interesting. I think J can implement it by > changing parser/tokenizer to recognize name_a$b$c_ as name in > locale c within locale b which is inside locale a. > a is in copath of a$b which is in copath of a$b$c. > > Пт, 07 апр 2017, Raul Miller написал(а): > > If we *do* change that, then perhaps we should also be thinking about > > being able to nest locales (much like K's namespaces), also. > > > > The current flat arrangement is based on this rationale which we are > > now questioning. > > > > Put differently: we should not simply change how things work without > > thinking through the implications of that change. > > > > (We will also need a way of determining the locale of an anonymous > > verb, for example. Also: would it be possible to have a locale-free > > verb? If not, what are the implications of that?) > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Raul > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Currently, yes. But the question is whether we should change that. > > > > > > Henry Rich > > > > > > On 4/6/2017 4:41 PM, Raul Miller wrote: > > >> > > >> Anonymous verbs do not *have* a locale. Locale is an aspect of names > > >> and how things are named. > > >> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > -- > regards, > ==================================================== > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
