It is valid, but don’t think it is what was intended …

The following 2 statements produce the same result:
   3j5
3j5

  (3) j. (5)
3j5

And these 2 statements produce the same result also.
   3j.4      NB. This is a valid complex constant of 3+i*0.4
3j0.4

   (3) j. (0.4)
3j0.4

As Raul pointed out, “j.” is a very, but the sequence 9j9 is part of contiguous 
word formation (makes a complex constant).…/Rob


> On 1 Jul 2017, at 7:33 pm, Martin Kreuzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Looking at the examples, I came across the difference between
> 
>   3 j. 4      NB. spaces
> 3j4
> 
> and
> 
>   3j.4      NB. no spaces
> 3j0.4
> 
> Given that this (rightfully) throws an error
> 
>   .2 .3 .4 .5
> |syntax error
> |        .2 .3 .4 .5
> 
> while this doesn't
> 
>   0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
> 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
> 
> why then is the construct  3j.4 valid..?
> 
> -M
> 
> 
> At 2017-07-01 04:43, you wrote:
> 
>> > As Henry points out, the NuVoc page is quite a bit clearer on this topic.
>> 
>> Sample google search:
>>   site:jsoftware.com inurl:nuvoc complex
>> 
>> Quite a bit of reading there, if you have the patience for it (be sure
>> to mix in plenty of trial and error, though, or it's a total snoozer).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> --
>> Raul
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Rob Hodgkinson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi Lawrence, the “ill-formed number” is because "j." is a verb, quite 
>> > different to “j” which is part of a noun construct (like 3j4, or 1e3 
>> > for 1000).
>> 
>> > So in your examples ...
>> 
>> > NB. But wait, not so fast:
>> >   1j.(2^0.5)%2
>> > |ill-formed number
>> > NB. No
>> 
>> > NB. Now try to separate the “j.” verb with a space either side to make 
>> > it clear to J that this is not “1jxxx” where J would assume you are 
>> > trying to make a complex constant.
>> >    1 j. (2^0.5)%2
>> > 1j0.707107
>> 
>> > The reason is that J can also directly interpret ‘complex constants’ 
>> > entered directly using the j notation (as a continuous sequence of 
>> > non-blank chars)…
>> >    3j4    NB. This is a single complex constant 3+i4
>> > 3j4
>> 
>> >    3 j4    NB. But now J tries to view this as a list of (3) and (j4) 
>> > which which J would assume is (3) and a variable called (j4).
>> > |syntax error
>> > | 3 j4
>> 
>> > As Henry points out, the NuVoc page is quite a bit clearer on this topic.
>> 
>> > HTH, Regards Rob
>> 
>> 
>> >> On 1 Jul 2017, at 1:14 pm, Lawrence Wickert <[email protected]> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,  I am a old EE still trying to learn.  I am a real beginner having 
>> >> no end of problems with specifying complex numbers.  I am using j64-804 
>> >> on ubuntu 12.04.  I am either doing something really stupid or I need to 
>> >> update to 806.  Updating anything gives me heartburn or worse so I hope 
>> >> it is just my misunderstanding of basic principles. Although I have a bad 
>> >> habit of RTFM as a last resort I have tried the Dictionary to no avail.  
>> >> I appreciate any guidance.
>> >>
>> >>   0j(2^0.5)%2
>> >> |ill-formed number
>> >>
>> >>   0j((2^0.5)%2)
>> >> |ill-formed number
>> >>
>> >>   j.(2^0.5)%2
>> >> 0j0.707107
>> >> NB. Eureaka, OK, I get it!
>> >>
>> >> NB. But wait, not so fast:
>> >>   1j.(2^0.5)%2
>> >> |ill-formed number
>> >> NB. No
>> >>
>> >>   1j(2^0.5)%2
>> >> |ill-formed number
>> >> NB. Still No
>> >>
>> >>   1+j.(2^0.5)%2
>> >> 1j0.707107
>> >> NB. This works!
>> >>
>> >> Let's try to do something with it:
>> >>   k=:(0 1+j.(2^0.5)%2 3 4 0 5)
>> >> |length error
>> >> |   k=:(0 1    +j.(2^0.5)%2 3 4 0 5)
>> >>
>> >> NB. Maybe parantheses will help:
>> >>   k=:(0 (1+j.(2^0.5)%2) 3 4 0 5)
>> >> |syntax error
>> >> |   k=:(    0(1+j.(2^0.5)%2)3 4 0 5)
>> >>
>> >> NB. This one has to work:
>> >>   k=:(0 1j0.7071 3 4 0 5)
>> >>   k
>> >> 0 1j0.7071 3 4 0 5
>> >> NB. It does but it can't be the only way to do it.
>> >>
>> >> NB. One last rry:
>> >>   g=: 1+j.(2^0.5)%2
>> >>   g
>> >> 1j0.707107
>> >> NB. That's nice.
>> >>
>> >>   k=:(0 g 3 4 0 5)
>> >> |syntax error
>> >> |   k=:(    0 g 3 4 0 5)
>> >> NB. This isn't nice.
>> >>
>> >> Lost in the high desert of New Mexico, Larry Wickert
>> >>
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to