What a coincidence that this type of question was posed a day after I suggested to incorporate the unofficial Jx interpreter verb extension =:: into the official interpreter!
I am afraid that it is not possible to produce of that kind of verbs without involving an explicit verb (or an adverb or a conjunction) which refer to its argument (such as 3 :'5!:5<''y''' which is not tacit) . I would be glad if someone can prove me wrong. On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Nikolas Drosdek <[email protected]> wrote: > This is exactly what I was looking for, thanks a lot! > > I am slightly confused by this however: > > 13 : '5!:5<''y''' > (,'1')"_ > > as it seems to replace y with 1 instead of giving 3 : '5!:5<''y'''. > > Thanks, > N.D. > > 2017-07-05 3:28 GMT+03:00 Raul Miller <[email protected]>: > > > Well, that depend on what you mean by a "tacit expression". > > > > If your concept of tacit is one which does not use names, then no, > > because this expression uses names. > > > > If you prefer a more relaxed concept of tacit programming, however, > > you might try something like this: > > > > lrep=: 3 :'5!:5<''y''' > > V=: [: ". 'R=:R,' , lrep > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Raul > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Nikolas Drosdek > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Explicitly: > > > > > > R=: 0 > > > V=: 3 : 'R=: R , ...' > > > > > > Is there a way to write V in tacit form? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > N.D. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
