?."?. doesn't do it. My guess without testing, and some possible circumstantial justification for it not being a bug, would be $:
On Sunday, August 9, 2020, 08:29:08 p.m. EDT, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: Well, technically: ?"? 8 8 0 4 ? 8 8 6 2 I am not sure if that's the issue you were thinking of, but it matches the words you used. -- Raul On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 10:37 AM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know of one verb u for which it is true that u"u may produce a > different result from u by itself. (u"u means u applied at the rank of > u, and [x] (u -: u"u) y would be a tautology except for this u.) > > What is the u? Note that I am interested only in the results of u and > u"u, not any side effects that might result from applying other > operators to u. > > Henry Rich > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
