Is it worth noting that the ``:6 version of train formation can be extended to produce arbitrary length trains?
For example, these are equivalent: V1 (C1 ` C2 ` C3 (``:6) C4) V2 V1 C1 V2 V1 C2 V2 V1 C3 V2 V1 C4 V2 Thanks, -- Raul On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 6:22 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, good point. The question is, Is that simple enough that when the > user says 'I want a hook' we say 'Sure, it's u ([. (``:6) ].) v'; or is > it worth a parsing rule to be able to say 'Sure, it's u ([. ].) v'.. > > This is a subjective question. And depends on what else (C C) could mean. > > Henry Rich > > On 10/4/2021 6:16 PM, Raul Miller wrote: > > I do not know of any useful examples of verb hooks formed from a pair > > of conjunctions applied to a pair of verbs. > > > > However, I do know how to form a verb hook from a pair of conjunctions > > applied to a pair of verbs, in the current j903 beta: > > > > + ([. (``:6) ].) - > > + - > > > > No new parsing rule necessary. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
