We have the example of (m : n) which routinely produces any part of speech.
The adverb (5!:0) can likewise produce anything.
Conjunctions producing conjunctions are used in the calculus addon.
So: unusual, but not anomalous.
Henry Rich
On 10/4/2021 6:41 PM, Elijah Stone wrote:
FWIW I support the CC hook and find the gerunds inelegant.
But is not a conjunction which produces a noun similarly anomalous to
a conjunction which produces an adverb?
-E
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021, Henry Rich wrote:
I'm sure somebody will like it.
But it can never be used to produce (V N), because V`N does not
convert N into an AR.
Henry Riich
On 10/4/2021 6:33 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
Is it worth noting that the ``:6 version of train formation can be
extended to produce arbitrary length trains?
For example, these are equivalent:
V1 (C1 ` C2 ` C3 (``:6) C4) V2
V1 C1 V2 V1 C2 V2 V1 C3 V2 V1 C4 V2
Thanks,
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
