On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:17 PM 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming <programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote: > Another way to state the equivalence of @, in linear form rather than tacitly > > u"v [x] v y
That's indeed a valid way of describing @ (That said: that format would become cumbersome for some other primitives. The dictionary format would work here and elsewhere, but it unfortunately elides the "part of speech indicator" which english language dictionaries typically provide.) Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm