On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:17 PM 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
<programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
> Another way to state the equivalence of @, in linear form rather than tacitly
>
> u"v [x] v y

That's indeed a valid way of describing @

(That said: that format would become cumbersome for some other
primitives. The dictionary format would work here and elsewhere, but
it unfortunately elides the "part of speech indicator" which english
language dictionaries typically provide.)

Thanks,

-- 
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to