Another way to state the equivalence of @, in linear form rather than tacitly
u"v [x] v y On Monday, June 27, 2022, 03:30:35 p.m. EDT, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming <programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote: You have brought up a bug in dicitionary, that has survived to J6.02 @: has the correct analogous quoted linear definition. the actual equivalence is 1 2 3 ([: +/ *)"* 4 5 6 4 10 18 or, ([: u v)"v On Monday, June 27, 2022, 08:21:47 a.m. EDT, Jacques Bailhache <jacques.bailha...@gmail.com> wrote: According to https://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d620.htm : x u@v y ↔ u x v y But : 1 2 3 +/@* 4 5 6 4 10 18 +/ 1 2 3 * 4 5 6 32 Why does it give different results ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
