On 8/30/07, Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A <@;@(1&C.)@,"1 0/ B
Or, using the original values for A and B (>A) <@;@(1&C.)@,"1 0/ B (A prefsuf B) -: ,(>A) <@;@(1&C.)@,"1 0/ B 1 But, yeah, I think >A better represents the purpose of that data structure than the original A. (I think < should be reserved for cases where you must deal with mixed structures -- and variable length strings count as being structurally different.) -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
