Raul wrote: > we could have a different foreign (perhaps 8!:6, since > 6!:8 is taken, or perhaps something else) to do date > formatting.
Since this change is, apparently, is fait accompli, I prefer this option to extending 6!:0 . I have strong reservations about the change in meaning from 6!:0'' to 6!:0' ' . Plus, as has been underlined by others, it is foreseeable that people will want to format timestamps others than "right now" (might we call this mistaken assumption a "nonce error"?). -Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
