> and in this regard they stand out, because despite their new
> pronunciation (presumed, not specified, yes?),  ...

http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/APLDictionary.htm
A Dictionary of APL, 1987, Section II, Grammar.

A name assigned to a noun will be called a _pronoun_, 
and one assigned to a verb may be called a _proverb_ 
(pronounced with a long o as in “pronoun” to distinguish 
it from the existing English word). 



----- Original Message -----
From: PMA <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2011 17:27
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] One word description of J
To: Programming forum <[email protected]>

> I realize I should have noted re "proverb" ("ambivalence" too)
> that these are not simply old words with new meaning -- like
> the others mentioned and a zillion more examples, J or no J,
> that occur every day -- but new *words*, because they are
> pronounced differently from their antecedents.
> 
> and in this regard they stand out, because despite their new
> pronunciation (presumed, not specified, yes?), their spelling
> remains unchanged.  rings forced to me -- but, I'll admit, not
> to the extent that I'd want to change J's "proverb".
> 
> 
> Dan T. Abell wrote:
> > long 'o', fer sure!
> > also, I stress the *third* syllable in ambivalent
> >
> > On 8 Jun 2011, at 05:58, PMA wrote:
> >
> >> I've never doubted his awareness of it.  How about
> >> pronunciation in this case -- do you folks speak the
> >> J term with a long 'o' (as I would assume from its
> >> derivation)?
> >>
> >> Roger Hui wrote:
> >>> Ken was well aware of the existing meaning
> >>> of "proverb" when he coined the new meaning for
> >>> it in J.  He was not one to let existing meanings
> >>> stand in the way if the new meaning is apt.
> >>> e.g. noun, verb, adverb, valence, ambivalence,
> >>> locale, inflection, rank, ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: PMA<[email protected]>
> >>> Date: Tuesday, June 7, 2011 18:02
> >>> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] One word description of J
> >>> To: Programming forum<[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>>> This reminds me to ask: When the J term "proverb" was invented
> >>>> (derived via grammatical logic from the existing 
> "pronoun"), what
> >>>> thought was given to the result's pre-existence in the language
> >>>> as meaning something *else*?
> >>>>
> >>>> P.A.
> >>>>
> >>>> [email protected] wrote:
> >>>>> I think that the word "feral" has negative and destructive
> >>>>> connotations.  Not a word to use if you want to promote
> >>>> the use of J
> >>>>> to a manager.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Surely we need a word that indicates incredible usefulness or
> >>>>> competence.  How about "dextrous" or "omnidextrous".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Simon
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Quoting John Baker<[email protected]>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I've been thinking about what's a good single word
> >>>> description of J.
> >>>>>>     Something that suggests the 
> important features of
> >>>> the language and conveys
> >>>>>> the spirit of J programming.  I offer the word:
> >>>> feral.  Here's a footnote I
> >>>>>> recently added to the upcoming JOD 0.9.3 documentation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Coming up with an accurate description of J is a challenge.
> >>>> The language is
> >>>>>> definitely array oriented and contains an almost pure 
> functional>>>>>> tacit sub-language. However J also contains 
> substantial>>>> imperative features
> >>>>>> and its clever use of locales and locale paths simulates most
> >>>> of the useful
> >>>>>> features of object oriented languages. Waving your hands and
> >>>> declaring a
> >>>>>> language multi-paradigm or agile is the standard way out but
> >>>> unfortunately>>   this does not distinguish J. I 
> think J is a
> >>>> *feral* programming language.
> >>>>>> The word feral sounds like a mixture of functional and
> >>>> imperative and the
> >>>>>> established meaning of feral: almost wild, wilily, able to
> >>>> survive on your
> >>>>>> own but willing to cooperate – on your own terms - conveys
> >>>> the independent
> >>>>>> free thinking character of J programmers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to