It's extremely hard to figure out what's going on with only vague descriptions and guesses at what might be the problem. People are eager to help if you can provide enough code for them to reproduce the error. You'll often find the error yourself in the process of reducing the code to the minimum required to show others how to get it.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's hard to visualize what is happening here. It's possible, for > example, that you have shadow definitions (this can happen if you are > using =. in the definition -- then the script will not overwrite any > existing definition). > > There could be other issues also. It's really hard to isolate a > problem when we cannot inspect it for ourselves. > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:56 PM, PackRat <pack...@anet.com> wrote: > > I'm creating a script that will execute several explicit verbs within > > the same script. I currently have the main explicit verb (with twp > > lines that retrieve the L/R args and a smoutput command to test that > > the L/R args are retrieved correctly) and one other explicit verb where > > every line is remarked out (via NB. commands). Just in case it makes a > > difference (which I don't think it does or should), some of the lines > > in the second verb have additional internal NB. commands at the end of > > the lines. (In other words, some lines look like this: NB. code NB. > > comment) > > > > The problem that I can't understand and which acts like a bug is that, > > when I load the script and execute it (something like "3 4 eph09 > > 1980"), the interpreter gives an index error relating to one of the > > lines in the REMARKED-OUT verb within the script, which line contains > > an amend command. Isn't the interpreter supposed to ignore remarked- > > out lines? Thanks in advance for any insights (or corrections or > > workarounds) so that I can continue programming! > > > > > > Harvey > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Devon McCormick, CFA ^me^ at acm. org is my preferred e-mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
