It's what Raul suggested and it's something that has bitten me in the past
as well.

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:59 AM, PackRat <pack...@anet.com> wrote:

> Raul Miller wrote:
> > It's hard to visualize what is happening here.  It's possible, for
> > example, that you have shadow definitions (this can happen if you
> > are using =. in the definition -- then the script will not overwrite
> > any existing definition).
> > There could be other issues also.  It's really hard to isolate a
> > problem when we cannot inspect it for ourselves.
>
> and Devon McCormick wrote:
> > It's extremely hard to figure out what's going on with only vague
> > descriptions and guesses at what might be the problem.  People are
> > eager to help if you can provide enough code for them to reproduce
> > the error. You'll often find the error yourself in the process of
> > reducing the code to the minimum required to show others how to get
> > it.
>
> I know this is the advice usually given in instances like this.  That's
> why I delayed writing until I was frustrated beyond my limit.  The
> explicit verb definition had only 5 lines, like this:
>
> verbname=. 4 : 0
>   line to retrieve arg x
>   line to retrieve arg y
>   smoutput results
> )
>
> That's what frustrated me so much: the verb was doing absolutely
> minimal stuff.  In preparation for sending the full script, I loaded a
> new instance of J, and this time it consistently gave a "value error"
> (different from what I had reported), which didn't make sense either.
> So I looked over and looked over the code again.  And then I saw it,
> the simplest of typos: I had written  =.  instead of  =:  !
>
> When I corrected it, things ran fine.  Thanks for the help in seeing
> this!
>
>
> Harvey
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



-- 
Devon McCormick, CFA
^me^ at acm.
org is my
preferred e-mail
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to