It's a fact that they are treated as different types
3!:(0) _455 j. 0
16
3!:(0) _455j0
4
and here are some other observations
0 30 #: 455
15 5
0 30 #: _455 j. 0
_15 _5
0 30 #: _455
_16 25
0 30 #: _455j0
_16 25
On 25-06-12 11:35, Brian Schott wrote:
> Is the following relevant?
>
> 30 | _455 j. 0
> _5
> 30 | _455j0
> 25
> 9!:12''
> 5
> 9!:14''
> j701/2011-01-10/11:25 build: Feb 6 2011 16:16:29
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:28 AM, bill lam<[email protected]> wrote:
>> The J validation suite contains a test for complex residue
>>
>> 30 | _455 -> 25
>> 30 | _455 j. 0 -> _5 (should be 25)
>>
>> so the assertation failed, Does it also fail for offical J602 and
>> J701?
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
@@i = Arie Groeneveld
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
