Thank you, here's an example of the problem then: 30 | _455 25 30 | _455 j. 0 _5
-- Raul On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Aai <agroeneveld...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's a fact that they are treated as different types > > 3!:(0) _455 j. 0 > 16 > 3!:(0) _455j0 > 4 > > and here are some other observations > > 0 30 #: 455 > 15 5 > > 0 30 #: _455 j. 0 > _15 _5 > > 0 30 #: _455 > _16 25 > > 0 30 #: _455j0 > _16 25 > > > On 25-06-12 11:35, Brian Schott wrote: >> Is the following relevant? >> >> 30 | _455 j. 0 >> _5 >> 30 | _455j0 >> 25 >> 9!:12'' >> 5 >> 9!:14'' >> j701/2011-01-10/11:25 build: Feb 6 2011 16:16:29 >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:28 AM, bill lam<bbill....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The J validation suite contains a test for complex residue >>> >>> 30 | _455 -> 25 >>> 30 | _455 j. 0 -> _5 (should be 25) >>> >>> so the assertation failed, Does it also fail for offical J602 and >>> J701? > > -- > Met vriendelijke groet, > @@i = Arie Groeneveld > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
