Oh, yes. It seems that e. is exactly what I was looking for when I made contains. Thanks. :D
- Max On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Max Harms <raeli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://pastebin.com/RjQA69j6 > > I put up a slightly modified version of this > > http://pastebin.com/diff.php?i=rBmYn6R1 > > Mostly, I replaced contains with e. > > I keep thinking I made a mistake, looking at the diffs, but I think > that's a pastebin bug. > > Looking at the algorithm, I'm tempted to restructure it -- the result > would not be A* (but would be closely related to A*). But I haven't > thought this through -- it might be a bad idea. > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
