>> Please let us know if we should change our callers of p_r_s(). > > It is not strictly speaking necessary, since I'll apply the patch > modified in the `convert' style, as discussed. So we'll be good. > > However, it may be interesting if you check and switch your callers > anyway one day, especially if you may happen to want to use lower-level > APIs in the future, such as search_unit(), because lower-level APIs > assume that arguments were already properly washed before.
This sounds good to me. Do you want me to change the patch or will you modify it at merge time, Tibor? Joe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
