Hi again, >> The reasons why I haven't done it myself, besides the lack-of-time issue >> (bad excuse) are that on my instances I have a mix of >> better-than-default values and local ones; > > Well, it would be great if you could drop me some sort of list in case > your previous post was not complete. We're about to roll out some > installation here based on recent Invenio so we might work that in if > it's not already done.
Let me publish my logical fields list here on the list, because it is easy and likely to be useful to most readers (I've left off a few local fields): 4. Logical fields overview _____________________________________________________________________________ |Field__________|MARC_Tags____________________|Translations___________________| | |00%, 01%, 02%, 03%, 04%, 05%,| | | |06%, 07%, 08%, 09%, 10%, 11%,| | | |12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%,| | | |18%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 22%, 23%,| | | |24%, 25%, 26%, 27%, 28%, 29%,| | | |30%, 31%, 32%, 33%, 34%, 35%,| | | |36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40%, 41%,| | | |42%, 43%, 44%, 45%, 46%, 47%,|ca, cs, de, el, en, es, fr, it,| |any_field |48%, 49%, 50%, 51%, 52%, 53%,|no, pt, ru, sk, sv, uk | | |54%, 55%, 56%, 57%, 58%, 59%,| | | |60%, 61%, 62%, 63%, 64%, 65%,| | | |66%, 67%, 68%, 69%, 70%, 71%,| | | |72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76%, 77%,| | | |78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%,| | | |84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%,| | | |90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%,| | |_______________|96%,_97%,_98%________________|_______________________________| |title |130%, 210%, 222%, 240%, 245%,|ca, cs, de, el, en, es, fr, it,| |_______________|246%,_247%,_730%,_740%_______|no,_pt,_ru,_sk,_sv,_uk_________| |author |100%, 110%, 111%, 700%, 710%,|ca, cs, de, el, en, es, fr, it,| |_______________|711%,_720%___________________|no,_pt,_ru,_sk,_sv,_uk_________| |abstract |520% |ca, cs, de, el, en, es, fr, it,| |_______________|_____________________________|no,_pt,_ru,_sk,_sv,_uk_________| |keyword |653% |ca, cs, de, el, en, es, fr, it,| |_______________|_____________________________|no,_pt,_ru,_sk,_sv,_uk_________| |series_________|830%,_440%,_490%_____________|ca,_en,_es_____________________| |subject |600%, 610%, 611%, 650%, 651% |ca, cs, de, el, en, es, fr, it,| |_______________|_____________________________|no,_pt,_ru,_sk,_sv,_uk_________| |fulltext |8564%u |ca, cs, de, el, en, es, fr, it,| |_______________|_____________________________|no,_pt,_ru,_sk,_sv,_uk_________| |collection |980% |ca, cs, de, el, en, es, fr, it,| |_______________|_____________________________|no,_pt,_ru,_sk,_sv,_uk_________| |year |260%c, 973%y |ca, cs, de, el, en, es, fr, it,| |_______________|_____________________________|no,_pt,_ru,_sk,_sv,_uk_________| |record_ID |001 |ca, cs, de, el, en, es, fr, it,| |_______________|_____________________________|no,_pt,_ru,_sk,_sv,_uk_________| |issn___________|773%x,_022%a_________________|ca,_en,_es,_fr_________________| The indexes is one-to-one with this one *except* for keyword. What we have done is to keep the proper subject tags on the official 600, 610, 611, 650 and 653 and keyword as 653, but merge them as *indexes*, so the index for keyword (Pàgina inicial > Admin Area > Manage Indexes) has both the subject and the keyword fields. That's the solution we've come with. And about the bibformat and friends, that is: lib/python/invenio/bibformat_elements/ etc/bibformat/format_templates/ etc/bibformat/output_formats/ I keep them under guilt patches (http://repo.or.cz/w/guilt.git or http://packages.debian.org/guilt), but they would only apply to a 0.99.1 release. I can happily send you a tarball for each; but please understand there is a mix of better, worse and bad solutions, as I have been learning to tame the beast over those years. I'll come to you back in a while. Cheers, Ferran
