> Robert Kaiser wrote: "mozdev is hard to navigate for novices"
I certainly agree with this. After 8 years of growth, mozdev is in need of a redesign that addresses branding and usability issues. What might have worked for a dozen projects doesn't necessarily work for thousands. > and "every useful extension for end users should be on AMO." IMO, AMO and mozdev serve two different purposes. AMO is a great place to serve stable versions of an extension to a wide audience and mozdev is a place to do development of a project that allows you to easily serve new versions of an extension or application. It's been a goal of ours to make it easier for mozdev project owners to update their code on AMO, so maybe this is one way to get around the frustration some people are expressing about having to wait a long time to get their code an AMO reviewed and updated. > What do you think? Do we need to make a change, and if that is a yes > what should we change? There are a lot of areas that could be improved, so we welcome your feedback about what you would like to see done on mozdev. We know things aren't perfect, so you won't hurt our feelings if you tell us what sucks about the site :) David _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
