Douglas E. Warner wrote: > On Friday 25 January 2008, Douglas E. Warner wrote: > >> The difference is that the first file is older and is being served by our >> mirrors, while the second file hasn't been synced to any mirrors yet so is >> being served from our local server. I'm looking into why the second method >> isn't working properly. >> > > The problem should be fixed now. I was sending an additional > Content-Disposition header that was making Firefox fownload the file as an > attachment rather than letting the extension manager install it. > > -Doug > >
Thanks Doug :) *You're my hero* ;) _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
