On Friday 25 January 2008, Douglas E. Warner wrote: > The difference is that the first file is older and is being served by our > mirrors, while the second file hasn't been synced to any mirrors yet so is > being served from our local server. I'm looking into why the second method > isn't working properly.
The problem should be fixed now. I was sending an additional Content-Disposition header that was making Firefox fownload the file as an attachment rather than letting the extension manager install it. -Doug -- Douglas E. Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Site Developer Mozdev.org http://www.mozdev.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
