Hi Prabhat,

It's published and can be found 
here 
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001046552400119X?via%3Dihub

Thank you,
Ruochun

On Wednesday, April 3, 2024 at 3:27:46 AM UTC+8 [email protected] wrote:

> Hi Ruochun,
>
> Thank you so much for your response. I would very much appreciate it if 
> you notify me once the paper gets published.
>
> Thanks,
> Prabhat
>
> On Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at 3:29:16 AM UTC-7 Ruochun Zhang wrote:
>
>> Hi Prabhat,
>>
>> To answer your question: You probably see a warning in your output file,
>> """"
>> WARNING! At least one clump is initialized with a position out of the box 
>> domain you specified.
>> It is found at 0.378, 0, 0.076383 (this message only shows one such 
>> example).
>> This simulation is unlikely to go as planned.
>> """
>> This is the problem. It appears that the points you sampled live in x∈[0, 
>> 0.4], but the x range of your simulation world is defined as something like 
>> [-0.25, 0.25]. This will make the particles to be initialized in unexpected 
>> locations, cause large initial penetrations, and then destabilize the 
>> simulation. I fixed the world size definition, and it seems to fix the 
>> problem. The extremely fine step size you are using is not necessary: The 
>> physics in this simulation is simple.
>>
>> By the way, in the upcoming paper about DEME 
>> <https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04648>, we will include a Goldenberg test 
>> example, and provide the associated demo script. If you want, we can let 
>> you know when it is officially published.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Ruochun
>> On Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at 1:41:58 AM UTC+8 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> I have been trying to replicate the 2D Goldenberg et al experiment 
>>> <https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.084302> in 
>>> DEME. It was replicated as a validation study for Chrono::GPU (as described 
>>> in the 2021 paper <https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9101813>), so I figured it 
>>> could be easily done in DEME too. However, I am having some issues with 
>>> generating particles and having them settle under gravity. I have been 
>>> using a nested for loop to generate the initial positions of particles and 
>>> while I don't have any issues with the generation of positions (see 
>>> attached paraview screenshot), I encounter the excessive velocity run-time 
>>> error while settling the particles under gravity. I have tried to decrease 
>>> the step size, increase the box domain dimensions to eliminate boundary 
>>> effects, relax the physics (decrease the Young's modulus of the terrain), 
>>> and increased the initial safety distance of the particles to no avail. 
>>>
>>> I have attached my code to this message and I have been modifying the 2D 
>>> ball drop demo. 
>>>
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> Prabhat
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ProjectChrono" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/1c80af0a-8db5-45a9-a861-71037e475733n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to