Hi Bona,

Thanks for sharing the source code. I will look into it and will reach out 
if I have any questions/confusion.

Thanks,
Prabhat

On Thursday, May 23, 2024 at 10:53:57 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:

> Hi Prabhat,
>
> you will find the new case at 
> https://github.com/projectchrono/DEM-Engine/blob/main/src/demo/DEMdemo_ContactChain.cpp
> .
>
> Note that he initial particle positioning was created as a list (outside 
> of DEME). This allows keeping the template concise while only leveraging 
> DEME's features (such as initiating simulations from files, changing 
> properties on the fly, single instance control).
>
> Thank you,
> Bonaventura
>
> On Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 1:48:37 PM UTC+2 Ruochun Zhang wrote:
>
>> Hi Prabhat,
>>
>> Bona will be following up on this question on this thread soon.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Ruochun
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 5:29:08 AM UTC+8 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I'm just following up on my message here. 
>>>
>>> On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 2:00:49 PM UTC-7 Prabhat Paudyal wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you Ruochun for letting me know. One more thing: when can we 
>>>> expect to see the demo script of the Goldenberg test example in the repo? 
>>>> I 
>>>> don't think it is there. 
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Prabhat
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, April 30, 2024 at 5:26:15 AM UTC-7 Ruochun Zhang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Prabhat,
>>>>>
>>>>> It's published and can be found here 
>>>>> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001046552400119X?via%3Dihub
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Ruochun
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, April 3, 2024 at 3:27:46 AM UTC+8 [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ruochun,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you so much for your response. I would very much appreciate it 
>>>>>> if you notify me once the paper gets published.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Prabhat
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at 3:29:16 AM UTC-7 Ruochun Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Prabhat,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To answer your question: You probably see a warning in your output 
>>>>>>> file,
>>>>>>> """"
>>>>>>> WARNING! At least one clump is initialized with a position out of 
>>>>>>> the box domain you specified.
>>>>>>> It is found at 0.378, 0, 0.076383 (this message only shows one such 
>>>>>>> example).
>>>>>>> This simulation is unlikely to go as planned.
>>>>>>> """
>>>>>>> This is the problem. It appears that the points you sampled live in 
>>>>>>> x∈[0, 0.4], but the x range of your simulation world is defined as 
>>>>>>> something like [-0.25, 0.25]. This will make the particles to be 
>>>>>>> initialized in unexpected locations, cause large initial penetrations, 
>>>>>>> and 
>>>>>>> then destabilize the simulation. I fixed the world size definition, and 
>>>>>>> it 
>>>>>>> seems to fix the problem. The extremely fine step size you are using is 
>>>>>>> not 
>>>>>>> necessary: The physics in this simulation is simple.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By the way, in the upcoming paper about DEME 
>>>>>>> <https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04648>, we will include a Goldenberg 
>>>>>>> test example, and provide the associated demo script. If you want, we 
>>>>>>> can 
>>>>>>> let you know when it is officially published.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> Ruochun
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at 1:41:58 AM UTC+8 [email protected] 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have been trying to replicate the 2D Goldenberg et al experiment 
>>>>>>>> <https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.084302> 
>>>>>>>> in 
>>>>>>>> DEME. It was replicated as a validation study for Chrono::GPU (as 
>>>>>>>> described 
>>>>>>>> in the 2021 paper <https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9101813>), so I 
>>>>>>>> figured it could be easily done in DEME too. However, I am having some 
>>>>>>>> issues with generating particles and having them settle under gravity. 
>>>>>>>> I 
>>>>>>>> have been using a nested for loop to generate the initial positions of 
>>>>>>>> particles and while I don't have any issues with the generation of 
>>>>>>>> positions (see attached paraview screenshot), I encounter the 
>>>>>>>> excessive 
>>>>>>>> velocity run-time error while settling the particles under gravity. I 
>>>>>>>> have 
>>>>>>>> tried to decrease the step size, increase the box domain dimensions to 
>>>>>>>> eliminate boundary effects, relax the physics (decrease the Young's 
>>>>>>>> modulus 
>>>>>>>> of the terrain), and increased the initial safety distance of the 
>>>>>>>> particles 
>>>>>>>> to no avail. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have attached my code to this message and I have been modifying 
>>>>>>>> the 2D ball drop demo. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards,
>>>>>>>> Prabhat
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ProjectChrono" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/3504f3e0-4d2d-4bea-a4e6-628d7f8a1275n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to