Kalo nabi sih takut dgn anjing, apalagi anjing hitam, hehehe... From: Sunny <am...@tele2.se> >To: proletar@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 4:00 PM >Subject: Re: [proletar] In the words of the Imams > > > >Film yang berjudul “Exorsist” dan “Ipolita” saya kira yang paling serem. > >From: Musik hari Ini >Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 10:13 AM >To: proletar@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [proletar] In the words of the Imams > >Sering kita jumpai dalam sebuah tayangan film horor, selalu >menghadirkan seekor kucing hitam sebagai latar atau figuran. Aksesoris >kucing hitam juga sering kali muncul dalam acara yang berkaitan dengan >dunia mistis.Seperti menjelang malam Binatang bermata menyala waktu malam hari >ini selalu dikaitkan dengan dunia sihir atau magic....................tatapan >matanya sungguh2 menakutkan pada siang & malam >Sebagian masyarakat percaya bahwa kehadiran kucing hitam selalu >diidentikkan dengan datangnya bangsa lelembut atau hantu. Biasanya >kucing hitam tak datang di sembarang tempat dan waktu. >Hanya tempat-tempat sepi dan wingit saja yang menjadi tempat kesukaan >munculnya kucing hitam. >Sebagian masyarakat mempercayai kehadiran kucing hitam adalah >pertanda keangkeran. Dimana kucing hitam dijumpai, pasti di sekitar >lokasi tersebut sedang ada hantu atau bangsa lelembut lain yang tengah >melakukan penampakan atau sekedar melintas. Huh serem banget! >Kepercayaan akan kucing hitam bermula dari sejarah di jaman Babylonia kuno >tempo dulu. Saat itu kucing hitam dipersembahkan dalam upacara >ritual untuk dibakar bersama sesaji lainnya. Mitos ini timbul karena ada >seekor kucing hitam yang tidur di tengah-tengah seekor ular dengan >pulasnya, padahal saat itu ular merupakan lambang dari kejahatan.(Saduran >bebas) > >________________________________ >From: Musik hari Ini <mailto:musikhariini%40yahoo.com> >To: "mailto:proletar%40yahoogroups.com"; <mailto:proletar%40yahoogroups.com> >Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 7:24 PM >Subject: Re: [proletar] In the words of the Imams > >Tem item,dua minggu yang lalu gua nemu seekor kucing > >Stray cat warnanya Item 100% kuwuk dalam bahasa Jawa > >die lagi korek2 jendela rumah gua .......begitu gua intip si item >rupanya.......gua panggil2 dateng >karena gua tidak experience dengan kucing hitam tentu ngeper juga.........! >(padahal 20 tahun terakhir gua selalu piara regular kucing) > >gua cuman ajak bicara kagak gendong2..........kayak nya masih dibawah satu >tahun >......gua bisa lihat dari cara dia pereksa2 tempat tinggal gua > >gua bener2 ngeper liat matanya kayak Cooper/emas....bulunya kayak sepatu di >polish > >tiap hari gua sajiin dah makanan dari ikan,ayam,susu& daging sapi........... >gua makin bingung dia doyan buah Olive!!! >gua makin kalang kabut die doyan juga dengan daging mentah! > >seminggu yang lewat gua ketiduran dikorsi panjang > >waktu ngendusin dia tidur dikaki gua ........alamat baik >tapi kemaren pagi gua lebih kaget lagi ,gua dibangunin ..............dia >berdiri diatas dada gua! > >bener2 gua makin penasaran > >sampai disini dulu dah..........gua kudu cari imformasi tentang "Si Item" soal >nya > >Urban legends kayak nya nih............. >tem elu kemana saja....................I miss you man. > >________________________________ >From: item abu <mailto:itemabu%40yahoo.com> >To: "mailto:proletar%40yahoogroups.com"; <mailto:proletar%40yahoogroups.com> >Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 6:15 PM >Subject: [proletar] In the words of the Imams > >Ini adalah perkataan dari imam, sheik (ahli Islam) atau orang penting di dunia >Islam. Siapa yg lebih kita percaya, mereka atau orang2 Islam kayak rezamettia, >Abbas Amin, Hasan Basri atau anjing buduk piaraan orang Islam spt suryana dan >Teddy? > >Ini contoh dr perkataan imam, hehehe.... >Imam Abu Hamza al-Masri: “Killing a Kafir for any reason, you can say it, it >is OK – even if there is no reason for it.” > >http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/islamic-jihad-articles/in-the-words-of-the-imams/ > >In the words of the Imams >3/31/2012 >In the words of the Imams >jonmc > >The sources for all these quotes are on the internet. Need I add that these >are less than a tithe of a tithe of the outpourings of bigotry, hatred, vile >anti-semitism, calls-to-violence etc. that are the stock-in-trade of many >Imams and Sheikhs – when speaking to Muslims that is? >Let me assure the reader that this is merely the flavour of what is said – >much inevitably goes unrecorded and unreported. In other words, these are what >the Imams deemed “fit for public consumption” rather than what may be said in >“closed session”. > >On non-Muslims. > >Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed (Syrian-born British cleric): “We don’t make a >distinction between civilians and non-civilians… Only between Muslims and >unbelievers. And the life of an unbeliever has no value.” >Comment:Bakri is being very hard on Kaffirs here. According to the Laws of >Qisas the non-Muslim’s life is worth half that of a Muslim, but this may only >apply to dhimmis. > >Sheik Riyadh ul Haq (Leicester UK Mosques): “the ones who are bitterest in >their enmity towards Muslims, the most unrelenting, unforgiving, are the Jews >and the idolators in all their forms [this use of “idolators” means all >non-Muslims in effect]. And lest someone say that’s provocative or that is >anti-Semitic, Allah, the creator of the Semite, says that.” >Comment: So that’s all right then. I can be a nasty, racist, xenophobic >promoter of Islamist intolerance because my god is too! > >Abu Usamah: “No one loves the kuffaar [non-Muslim], not a single person loves >the kuffaar, we hate the kuffaar! Allah has not given those people who are >kuffaar a way over the believer. They shouldn’t be in authority over us. >Muslims shouldn’t be satisfied with anything other than a total Islamic >state.” >Comment: I had trouble deciding whether to put this here, under Al-War’a >wal-bar’a or Islamic supremacy. Usamah gets the lot in here! > >Anjem Choudhery (A self-styled British “Imam”): “When we say innocent people >we mean Muslims. As far as non-Muslims are concerned, they haven’t accepted >Islam … [that's] a crime against god.” >Comment: Implicit here is that no (adult) kaffir is an innocent and that all >Kaffirs are “fair game” to be murdered. > >Sheik Nader Tamimi, Mufti of the Palestinian Liberation Army: “We Will Restore >the Caliphate and You [the West] Will Pay the Jizya or else we will bring the >sword to your necks.” >Comment:so much for the “religion of Peace”TM. Also note that this isn’t >“compulsion” since we have a choice – Jizya or death. > >On Islamic supremacy. > >Imam Abu Hamza al-Masri (Imam in Britain, Finsbury Park Mosque, London): “The >real weapons of mass destruction are the desire for martyrdom… Half a million >martyrdom shaheed is enough for Muslims to control the whole of earth forever. >In the end of the day, Islam must control earth, whether we like it or not.” >Comment: Thus the Imam is pursuing the Koran-mandated goal of world >domination. It sounds like a bad B-movie plot, but it isn’t – and that is >something that should concern us all. He is also calling for a half-million >suicide-bombers to blow themselves up whilst murdering non-Muslims. > >Dr Ijaz Mian (Derby mosques): “You are in a situation in which you have to >live like a state within a state, until you take over.” >Comment:And we wonder why Muslims do not integrate? And waste time on >“Outreach” etc. > >Dr Ijaz Mian: “[The] Queen, [the] House of Commons … if you accept it, you are >part of it. If you don’t accept it, you have to dismantle it. So being a >Muslim, you have to fix a target. There will be no House of Commons … Muslims >just grow in strength … then take over.” >Comment: At least we know the plan … not that Western governments of any >political stripe seem to care. > >Anjem Choudhery: “One day the flag of Islam will fly over the White House… One >day the flag of Islam will fly over Downing Street … Buckingham Palace will >become a Mosque.” >Comment:honesty is so refreshing. “Andy” Choudhery is always clear in stating >his aims. > >Imam Amir-Abdel Malik-Ali (Masjid Al Islam mosque, Oakland, CA): “We must >implement Islam as a totality (in which) Allah controls every place… the home, >the classroom, the science lab, the halls of Congress.” >Comment: this is what full-blown Islam means. Everything, every act, every >thought, is subordinated to Islam. It makes Orwells’ dystopia “1984” look >benign and enlightened. > >Imam Siraj Wahhaj (Masjid Al-Taqwa mosque. Brooklyn, N.Y):“In time, this >so-called democracy will crumble, and there will be nothing. And the only >thing left will be Islam.” >Comment:and the world will return to the stone-age. > >Imam Zaid Shakir (Former Chaplain at Yale University): “Muslims cannot accept >the legitimacy of the existing American order, since it is against the orders >and ordainments of Allah.” >Comment:Don’t think that is limited to America – any non-Sharia governed order >must be overthrown. > >Omar Ahmad (Council on American Islamic Relations, CAIR, not an Iman, but a >“representative” of American Islam): “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to >any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of >scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only >accepted religion on earth…” >Comment: as above. > >Ihsan Bagby (CAIR, as above): “Ultimately, we (Muslims) can never be full >citizens of this country [America] … because there is no way we can be fully >committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country…” >Comment: nor any other non-Sharia Country. > >Sheik Ibrahim Mudeiris (Sheikh ‘Ijlin Mosque in Gaza) “We have ruled the world >before, and by Allah, the day will come when we will rule the entire world >again. The day will come when we will rule Britain.” > >Sheik Abu Imran: Just as we ruled many European lands… we are coming to take >back what belongs to us, to regain our land and purify it of unbelief and of >the unbelievers. We are coming with “There is no god but Allah.” We are coming >because we reject democracy. We do not accept democracy. We accept nothing but >the tawhid of Allah. We accept nothing but: “There is no god but Allah.” We >accept nothing but the shari’a of Allah. >Comment:Implicit herein is a threat to massacre all non-Muslims. > >Shaykh Safwat Hegazy (Egypt): “Jerusalem belongs to us and the whole world >belongs to us. Every land upon which Islam has set foot will return to us, the >Caliphate will return to us… the greatness and glory of Islam will return.” > >Dr. Muhammad Musa Al-Sharif (Saudi Arabia): “The only thing that the sheiks, >preachers, and scholars are demanding is that Islam rule the world once >again.” >Comment:and they want so little! > >Imam Ahmad Nawfal (Jordanian Imam): “If fundamentalist Muslims stand up, it >will be very easy for us to preside over this world once again.” > >Sheikh Sayyid Qutb: “It is Allah and not man who rules. Allah is the source of >all authority, including legitimate political authority. Virtue, not freedom, >is the highest value. Therefore, Allah’s law [Sharia], not man’s, should >govern the society.” >Comment:therefore all other governments, laws, societies and systems must be >overthrown. > >On war, terror, violence and jihad. > >Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed: “Britain is dar-ul Harb…There should be, will be, >new operations [terror attacks] in London, inshallah [god willing].” >Comment:why terrorist attacks? To “strike terror into the hearts” of the >Kaffirs, of course – and to deny them a legitimate target in return. > >Imam Abu Hamza al-Masri:You must know the cause of Allah and you musthelp that >cause in fighting, by fighting and when you fight you kill, you fight to >kill.” >Comment: He could not be much plainer could he? He is a “plain warner”. You >help the cause of Allah (“fee sabili Allahi”) by fighting and killing; not >building hospitals, nor schools for girls. You help Allah by killing Kaffirs. > >Imam Abu Hamza al-Masri: “Killing a Kafir for any reason, you can say it, it >is OK – even if there is no reason for it.” >Comment: killing Kaffirs is just fine and dandy with Allah. > >Imam Abu Hamza al-Masri: “It [murder-bombing] is not called suicide [in >Islam], this is called martyring, because if the only way to hurt the enemies >of Islam [is] by taking your life for that then it is allowed.” >Comment: if you can’t fight in an open Jihad against Kaffirs, it’s definitely >Okay to blow yourself up, provided you take some Kaffirs with you. > >Imam Abu Mounisa: “He [Mohammed] went and destroyed them [non-Muslims], killed >them, chopped their heads off, beheaded them! …We need to attack the leaders, >David Cameron, we need to attack him.” >Comment:If he was not a Muslim he would now be in gaol for incitement to >murder of the British Prime-Minister (as of 2010). > >Imam Abdullah el-Faisal (roving hate-preacher): “You have to bomb the Indian >businesses, and as for the Jews you kill them physically”. >Comment:as above. > >Imam Abdullah el-Faisal: “An army of Muslims will arise against the >non-Muslims in England”. >Comment:incitement to civil war, he too, were he a non-Muslim, would be >prosecuted and imprisoned for “hate-crime”s and sedition. > >Imam Abu Mounisa: “You need to provoke society for society to be changed…You >need to attack law and order… Every day we should attack their system, just >like the prophet did.” >Comment: again he incites violence against Britain, in particular the Police >and security services. > >Imam Latif (Sutton “Companions of the Mosque”): “We don’t have Muslim >terrorists… they do not exist.” >Comment: he’s right – according to Islam. They are not terrorists, they are >“Shaheeds” – murderers for Islam (seems a common theme in prisons, btw). > >Imam Abdul Alim Musa (Al Masjid mosque, Washington, D.C.) “If you don’t give >us justice. If you don’t give us equality. If you don’t give us our share of >America. If you don’t stay out of our way and leave us alone, we’re gonna burn >America down.” >Comment: a clear statement that (some) American Muslims want their own >state(s) and a separate society within America. > >Imam Muhammad Al-Asi (Former Imam at the Washington, D.C. Islamic Center): >“Now, all our Imams, our public speakers, should be concentrating on >militarising the Muslim public … Only carrying arms will do this task.” >Comment:a ‘call to arms’ as a prelude to starting a civil war. > >Nihad Awad (CAIR): “I am in support of the Hamas movement.” >Comment:Therefore you are a terrorist, possibly a “passive” one, but a >terrorist nevertheless. > >Dr. Esam Omeish (Muslim American Society, MAS): “You have learned the way, >that you have known that the jihad way is the way to liberate your land.” >Comment: a call for Muslim-Americans to wage jihad to “liberate” America from >the Kaffir. > >Sheikh Abu Ishak Al Huweini (Egypt): “The reason we are poor now is because we >have abandoned jihad. If only we can conduct a jihadist invasion [of a >non-Muslim Country] at least once a year … and if anyone prevents our dawa or >stands in our way, then we must kill them or take [them] as hostage and >confiscate their wealth, women and children. Such battles will fill the >pockets of the Mujahid who can return home with 3 or 4 slaves, 3 or 4 women >and 3 or 4 children. This can be a profitable business if you multiply each >head by 300 or 400 dirham. This can be like financial shelter whereby a >jihadist, in time of financial need, can always sell one of these heads >(meaning slaves). No one can make that much money in one deal (from hard work) >even if a Muslim goes to the West to work or do trade. In time of need, that >is a good resource for profit.” >Comment:thus today, in 2011, we still have a Muslim leader promoting >sex-slavery and despoilment of the non-Muslim as a “get-rich-quick” scheme for >Mussalmen. > >Edina Lekovic (Muslim Public Affairs Council, MPAC): “When we hear someone >refer to the great mujahid Osama bin Laden as a ‘terrorist’, we should defend >our brother and refer to him as a freedom fighter…” >Comment:To the Muslim there are no terrorists in Islam, just freedom fighters >and shaheeds. This despite the fact that ‘Mujhaid’ bin Laden’s organisation >killed more Muslims than non-Muslims. > >Shukri Abu Baker (Holy Land Foundation): “I swear by Allah that war is >deception… We are fighting our enemy … Deceive, camouflage, pretend you are >leaving while you’re walking that way. Deceive your enemy.” >Comment:A call to taqqiya – or Muda’rat – to deceive the Kaffirs as to the >intentions of the Muslims. > >Ayatollah Khomeini: “Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam >counsels against war. Those (who say this) are witless. Islam says: kill all >of the unbelievers as they would kill you all.” > >Sheikh Qaradawi: the army leadership is not a purely civil job. It is one of >the worship jobs in Islam becauseJihad is on top of the Islamic worship acts.” >Comment: Qaradawi is making clear that sword-jihad (the Muslim army is the >“sword of Islam”) is the most “holy” or devout worship act a Muslim can carry >out. > >On al-War’a wal Bar’a (love and hate for Allah’s sake) > >Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed: “I belong [i.e. am loyal] to Islam. I did not >belong [i.e. owed loyalty] to Britain when I lived there. I refused to pledge >my allegiance to the Queen. I refused to swear that I would obey the Queen or >the laws. I obey only Allah and the messenger [Mohammed].” Note:the “pledge of >allegiance” is required for a foreign national requesting British citizenship. >Comment: Bakri clearly considers himself and indeed all Muslims “above” the >laws of Britain because they are not Sharia Law. > >Imam Abu Mounisa: “We should have the zeal in our hearts, for the sake of >Islam, to destroy all their [the non-Muslims'] system and replace it with >Islam.” >Comment: practical out-working of the doctrine of al-War’a wal Bar’a. > >Anjem Choudhery: “You must have allegiance where Sharia says you must have >allegiance, you must hate and love for the sake of Allah [al-War'a wal-Bar'a]. >So I must support my Muslim brothers and sisters wherever they are in the >World, I must have allegiance with them, I must cooperate with them, I must >love them… I must have hatred towards anything that is non-Islam.” >Comment: this means, in part, “I must help, shelter and protect terrorists”. > >Anjem Choudhery: “As far a Muslims are concerned, their allegiance is always >with the Muslims, so I will never condemn a Muslim for what he does even if he >is an oppressor.” [Said in relation to the 7/7 London bombings]. >Comment: as above, note also that implicit here is that no matter how evil the >act of a Muslim, other Muslims must side with him/her against non-Muslims. > >Sheikh Mohammed Nassar (Egypt): “When a child is brought up in a good home and >receives a proper education in faith he loves martyrdom, which becomes like an >instinct to him and he can never give it up.” >Comment:this was part of achildren’s TV program with a live audience of >children. Martyr here means “mass murderer”. > >Sheik Abu Imran (Belgian Islamist): “Oh Sarkozy, enemy of Allah, dog of the >Romans, son of the unbeliever, we are on our way. We are on our way with >“Allah Akbar,” “Allah Akbar.” We are coming, with our nuclear bombs of “Allah >Akbar.” We are coming, with our black flags – the black flags of “There is no >god but Allah, and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.” >Comment:the “black flag” of Islam is a war banner. It is a declaration of war >on the Kaffir. > >On Muslim “hypocrites”. > >Imam Abu Hamza al-Masri: “These [supporters and members of the Muslim >Parliament of Great Britain] are the pussy-cat Muslims,who do not understand >anything about Islam … What can the Muslim Parliament do? Just sit like >monkeys among the real MPs.” >Comment: the MPGB members are known as “moderates”. Here Bakri exposes them as >what they really are: half-hearted, un-knowledgeable believers – i.e. >“hypocrites” according to the Koran. > >On Islamic tolerance and equality. > >Imam Arshad Misbahi (Manchester Central Mosque): “the execution of gay Muslims >is part of the central tenets of Islam: sex outside marriage is forbidden; >this is stated in the Koran and the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) >had stated that these punishments [murder] were due to such behaviours.’ >Comment: He knows his barbaric Sharia! > >Abu Usamah, (American convert, resident in UK): ‘If I were to call homosexuals >perverted, dirty, filthy dogs who should be murdered … that’s my freedom of >speech, isn’t it?‘ >Comment: actually no. That crosses the line into incitement to murder (‘who >should be murdered’). > >Muhammad Rateb Al-Nabulsi (Syria): “Homosexuality involves a filthy place, and >does not generate offspring. Homosexuality leads to the destruction of the >homosexual. That is why, brothers, homosexuality carries the death penalty.” >Comment: Another rampant Muslim homophobic rant. > >Sheikh Khalifa (Kenya): “We are asking Kenyans to shun businesses owned by >such people [homosexuals] and further show them open discrimination as a way >of stopping the beastly act. [they] should not be accepted among the society. >“Death is the only punishment prescribed by Islam for such people. We urge our >government to consider allowing us to use such methods to deal with the >dehumanising acts.” >Comment:murdering people isn’t “dehumanising” but being a homosexual is? > >Imam Abu Hamza al-Misri: “If a kaffir person (non-Muslim) goes in a Muslim >country, he is like a cow. Anybody can take him. That is the Islamic law. …If >a kaffir is walking by and you catch him, he’s booty. You can sell him in the >market. …If Muslims cannot take them and sell them in the market, you just >kill them. It’s OK….I say the reality that’s in the Muslim books anyway. >Whether I say it or not, it’s in the books.” >Comment: (Unless you are an acknowledged dhimmi), you are fair game for >Muslims in Islamic Countries. You can be caught and treated as “ghanima” >(war-booty) and enslaved. > >Abu Usamah: ‘[women are] deficient, even if they have a PhD. Her intellect is >incomplete. She may be suffering from hormones that will make her emotional. >It takes two witnesses of a woman to equal the one witness of a man.’ >Comment: How comforting for Usamah to know he’s so very superior to every >woman. > >Imam Feisel Abdul Rauf (former leader “ground-zero mosque” project): “I do not >believe in religious dialogue.” > >Dr. Abd Al-Aziz Fawzan Al-Fawzan (Suadi Arabia): “Someone who denies Allah, >worships Christ, son of Mary … do you like these things he says and does? >Don’t you hate the faith of such a polytheist? … Whoever says, ‘I don’t hate,’ >is not a Muslim. This is not racism, we don’t hate a polytheist because of his >colour, gender, blood, country. But, if this person is an infidel, even if >this person is my mother or father, Allah forbid, or my son or daughter, I >must hate him.” >Comment:in short, “hate the Kaffir, the non-Muslim”. > >Abu Bakr (Australian Cleric): “My religion [Islam] doesn’t tolerate another >religion. It doesn’t tolerate. The only one law which needs to spread, it can >be here or anywhere else, has to be Islam.” > >Jamaat-e-Islami spokesman (Pakistan): “Such people [homosexuals] are the curse >of society and social garbage, they don’t deserve to be Muslim or Pakistani.” >Comment: Nothing like equal rights for all, no – seriously, NOTHING like equal >rights. > >Shaykh Muhammad Hassan (Egypt): “The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said: ‘It is >not permissible (to shed) the blood of a Muslim who witnesses that there is no >god but Allah and that I am the Messenger of Allah, except for one of the >following three conditions … (Third), the one who abandons his religion, and >separates himself from the community.’ The hadith is in both of the Sahihs >(i.e. Bukhari and Muslim). ‘The one who abandons his religion, and separates >himself from the community.’ Islam does not compel anyone to enter it. This >(concept) needs to be firmly established. Islam does not compel anyone to >enter it. No. There is no compulsion in religion. But rather we preach (Islam) >in truth, mercy, propriety, and humility. Whoever says after the >preaching—whoever says after (receiving) the preaching and the call (to >Islam), “No, I will not enter this religion.” We say to him, “There is no >compulsion in religion.” Truth stands out clear >from error. We recite the saying of Almighty Allah, “Let him who will believe, >and let him who will disbelieve” (Qur’an 18:29). We recite the saying of Allah >Almighty, “You have your religion and I have my religion” (Qur’an 109:6). >Beautiful. This is after the preaching and the call (to Islam). But if he >enters Islam of his own free will and choice, he does not have the right to >leave the religion of Allah whenever he wants, to shake the foundations of >Muslim society. No, he does not have the right. Absolutely not. But he does >have the right, after having (Islam) preached to him, to say, “I will enter” >or “I will not enter this religion.” But to enter it just to leave it whenever >he wants? No. This is something which is unacceptable in the religion of >Almighty Allah. Show me a constitution anywhere on earth which grants this for >its citizens. But rather whoever comes out against the constitution of any >nation is accused of treason. >Everyone familiar with treason knows that the penalty is death. So what do you >think about the one who betrays the religion of Allah Almighty, the one who >betrays Allah and His Messenger? “O ye who believe! Do not betray Allah and >His Messenger, nor knowingly betray your trusts” (Qur’an 8:27).” >Comment: Here we see how Islam interprets the “no compulsion in religion” >verse, regards apostasy as a “betrayal” of Islam (rather than a matter of >personal choice) or as “treason” (because Islam acknowledges no separation >between temporal and spiritual authority) and how Islam supports the murder of >apostates. It is also worth noting that the Sheikh makes no mention of the >fact that if you refuse to convert you are required to become a Dhimmi, which >means that whilst you do get to keep your religion, you lose your citizenship. > >Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah, (the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia): “[it is] >necessary to destroy all the churches of the region [Arabian Peninsula].” >Note: The Grand Mufti made his assertion in response to a question posed by a >delegation from Kuwait: a Kuwaiti parliament member recently called for the >“removal” of churches (he later “clarified” by saying he merely meant that no >churches should be built in Kuwait), and the delegation wanted to confirm >Sharia’s position on churches. Accordingly, the Grand Mufti “stressed that >Kuwait was a part of the Arabian Peninsula, and therefore it is necessary to >destroy all churches in it.” >Comment:thus we see how Islam reacts to other faiths within its own borders. > >On correct Muslim behaviour. > >Imam Omar Shahin (Tucson, Arizona Islamic Center): “A Muslim must try his best >to abide by the rulings of Sharia (Islamic law) whenever possible as much as >he can. He should not allow himself to be liable to those western laws that >contradict the clear-cut Islamic rulings.” >Comment:this is a reference to the doctrines of Tayseer (“ease”) and Darura >(“necessity”) – dispensations from following Sharia, born out of necessity – >or more accurately, to not over-using this dispensation. In other words it is >an obligation to hew as closely to Sharia as possible and (implicitly) to seek >to extend Sharia’s sway when possible -e.g. get all Public institutions to >offer Halal food as the default, get Muslim-only sessions in Libraries, >swimming-pools etc., object to overt displays of Xtian (etc.) symbolism and so >forth. > >Sheikh Muhammed Al-Munajid (Saudi Arabia): “A wife needs to comply with her >husband’s desires in bed. This is why he [Allah] ordered the wife to consent >to her husband. The wife must consent to her husband’s wishes and obey him. >The wife in the West is not obliged to do so. Moreover, a wife can be raped by >her husband there.They claim that if he has sex with her against her will, >this is rape! They consider this rape! They claim she must be willing! They >claim she must want it! Therefore the wife doesn’t submit [to] the man >whenever he wants. >Comment (sarcastic):fancy thinking that sex with an unwilling woman is rape! >Whatever next? Not being allowed to beat the cr*p out of them if they don’t >submit to you? > >Zakir Naik (In Pakistan): “If a Muslim becomes non-Muslim and propagates >his/her new religion then there is a death penalty in Islam for such a >person.” >Comment: In this case, Naik is rationalising apostasy as “treason” to the >Umma, but he still maintains it is right to murder people for leaving Islam. >This from a “moderate” Muslim. > >Marzan Al-Sarsawi (Egypt): “Someone who converted and got a taste of the >perfection of Islam is not allowed to leave the fold of Islam whenever he >feels like it.” >Comment: true, he’s murdered to stop him leaving. >Although not an “Imam” of any sort, this woman extolling using women for >sex-slavery (provided they aren’t Muslim of course) was too dreadful to >overlook. > >Salwa Al-Mteiri (Kuwait): “The Mufti [in Saudi Arabia] that it requires that >there to be a Muslim Country raiding [=Razia] a Christian Country, sorry, a >non-Muslim one and taking PoWs… He said that Islam does not prohibit having >slave-girls. On the contrary. The law pertaining to slave girls is not the >same as for free women. … With the free woman the man must make a >marriage-contract, but with a slave-girl all he has to do is buy her. It’s as >if he married her. [Kuwaiti scholars said] that for the average, good >religious man the only way to avoid forbidden relations with women is to >purchase slave girls. …I very much hope that such a law is legislated… they >should allow slave girls. We don’t want our children to fall into the abyss of >fornication and similar filth, god forbid. There are Countries like Chechnya >which are at war with another Country. In such cases there must be PoWs, so >why not go and buy these prisoners? Is it better for >them to be slaughtered over there? Go and buy them and sell them to traders >here in Kuwait.” >Comment: O where to begin? Just to hit the lowest of the low points: here we >have a Muslim woman advocating the capture of foreign women for the >sex-slavery – with the proviso that they aren’t Muslim of course. She >re-defines the meaning of “PoW” to be “any woman you can capture” and >implicitly states that Muslims murder their PoWs (as has happened in >Afghanistan to captured Western troops). The worst of it is that what she says >is all in accordance with the Koran and Sharia law. Further she regards the >repeated rape of a slave as preferable to consensual sex outside marriage. And >Muslims call others “immoral”! > >Sheikh Majid Khadduri: “The term spoil (ghanima) is applied specifically to >property acquired by force from non-Muslims. It includes, however, not only >property (movable and immovable) but also persons, whether in the capacity of >asra (prisoners of war) or sabi (women and children). … If the slave were a >woman, the master was permitted to have sexual connection with her as a >concubine.” >Comment:Let’s be clear: Khadduri is advocating that Muslims use force to >despoil non-Muslims, taking their land, goods, chattels, men (as slaves – if >they survive the process of castration which was commonly applied), their >women (as sex-slaves to be raped whenever the “master” wants) and their >children (as child-slaves and sex-slaves) – think Aisha: if its good enough to >marry a six year old girl-child and have sex with her at nine then the >“master” can, I presume, have sex with a nine-year old girl-slave too; not to >mention “thighing” at any age). > >Imam Mas’oud Anwar (Egypt): Wisdom and compassion require that a killer be put >to death, that a married adulterer be stoned, and that the hand of a thief be >chopped off. That is true compassion. Chopping off the treacherous hand of a >thief, to protect the entire nation, is compassion, mercy, and wisdom. >Comment:Thus Islam has an “interesting” definition of “compassion” – >Compassion as murder. > >Marzan Al-Sarsawi: “you tell them [non-Muslims] to convert, [if] they refuse, >you tell them to pay the jizya [if] they refuse it means they have evil >intentions, [so] fine, we will fight them.” >Comment:the “jizya”, a special ‘head-tax’ for non-Muslims – it allows you to >keep your head on your shoulders. “Evil intentions”, such dreadful things like >preserving liberty and freedom. > >Shaykh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni: “Whoever insults the Prophet (PBUH), if he later >comes and apologizes, and kisses the shoes (of the ruler), and says, ‘I want >all Muslims, every one, to return and strike me with the soles of their >feet’—does the ruler have the right to accept this? I bring up this question, >as it was asked of me. The answer is that it is not permissible for anyone to >accept this. Then what do we do with him? We kill him! But he told you that he >repented. We still kill him, even if he repents!” >Comment: The merciful attitude of Islam revealed again. > >Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi: The Islamic shari’ah governs all of the actions of >those who are obligated (to it). There is no act or occurrence which exists >without a corresponding ruling from one of the five shari’ah rulings >(obligatory, recommended, prohibited, reprehensible, or permitted). This has >been confirmed by fundamentalists and scholars from every faction and school >of thought associated with Islam… Whoever reads the books of the Islamic >shari’ah, I mean the books of Islamic jurisprudence, in its different schools >of thought, will find that they comprise all of the affairs of life, from the >jurisprudence of purity, to that of the family, society, and the state. This >is very clear for every elementary student, not to mention those in the world >who are more capable.” >Comment: Thus the governance of Sharia is all embracing. > >On Sex. > >In response to a gang rape, the Chief Mufti of Australia said, “If she was in >her room, in her home, in her Hijab, no problem would have occurred. The Koran >gives a similar justification for a head to toe covering for women, “O >Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to >draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies that they may thus be >distinguished and not molested.” (Koran 33:59) >Comment: thus any woman who isn’t burkha’d is definitely asking, nay begging, >to be gang-raped according to the ‘Imam’. You will note there is not the >slightest condemnation of the rapists here. > >A Kurdistani Mullah: “Allah says if a woman disobeys her husband he has the >right to beat her, but the lashes should be according to the Sharia … The >issue of female circumcision in Kurdistan. The mothers and sisters of more >than half of your party members were circumcised. This means that you insult >your own grandmother. You insult your own mother. You accuse them of >ignorance. Circumcision [FGM] is a tenant of Islamic law (sharia).” >Comment:Many Muslims claim that FGM has a social basis – not that that is any >better – but this Sheikh gives the lie to that claim. FGM is based in the >Sharia. > >On anti-semitism. > >Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi chief theologian of the Muslim Brotherhood: “Oh Allah, >take this oppressive, Jewish, Zionist band of people. Oh Allah, do not spare a >single one of them. Oh Allah, count their numbers, and kill them, down to the >very last one.” He also declared: “Throughout history, Allah has imposed upon >the people [Jews] who would punish them for their corruption. The last >punishment was carried out by [Adolf] Hitler.” >Comment:Islamic jew-hatred alive and well in the 14st Islamic century – just >like every other Islamic century. > >Yusuf al-Qaradawi:“Throughout history, Allah has imposed upon them (Jews), >people who would punish them for their corruption. The last was Hitler …. >Allah willing, the next time will be at the hands of believers (Muslims).” >Comment:This sounds alarmingly like a call for another holocaust. > >Imam Miqdam Al-Khadhari (Egypt):This is a very important book, a textbook >reader … at Al-Azhar. …the book moves to a topic with a large title, as clear >as day: “The Treachery of the Jews.” This title shows what the student is >about to learn. It is not talking about something marginal. It’s an important >topic. I haven’t seen any curriculum that presents this subject so explicitly. >This is the curriculum of 2008. I’m not talking about something ancient. This >is now! It’s a textbook from this year or last year. The next title, right >after “The Treachery of the Jews” – I think that the camera can show the >title… I’d like you to read it, dear brothers… “Islamic Jihad and Its Various >Forms.” They teach these topics so that the student will be militarized when >he graduates [from Al-Azhar].” >Comment: by “militarised” he means indoctrinated to hate Jews (along with all >other non-Muslims, but mostly Jews). > >Imam Unis Al-Astal: “The Jews are brought in droves to Palestine so that the >Palestinians and the Islamic nation [Umma, i.e. ALL Muslims] behind them will >have the honour of annihilating the evil of this gang. [All other threats] are >less dangerous than the Jews. In a few years all the Zionists and settlers >will realise that their arrival in Palestine was for the purpose of the great >massacre by means of which Allah wants to relieve humanity of their evil. When >Palestine is liberated and its people return to it and the entire region, with >the grace of Allah, will have turned into the United states of Islam, the land >of Palestine will become the capital of the Islamic Caliphate and all these >Countries will turn in to states within the Caliphate. When this happens any >Palestinian will be able to live anywhere, because the land of Islam is the >property of all Muslims. Until this happens we must reject all the >resettlement plans, naturalisations, or even >reparations prior to the return of the refugees.” >Comment:There is a lot here, the usual anti-Semitism, the fact that all the >land of the Dar-ul-Islam is solely the property of Muslims (irrespective of >who’s living there). Also an admission that the “Palestinian refugees” are >self-selecting – they will refuse any naturalisation etc. > >Sheikh Hussein Ye (Malaysia): “Always in the Koran when it says ‘magndub’ >[cursed] (or) ‘ghadab’ [hated] it goes to the Jews.” >Comment:thus anti-semitism is institutionalised in Islam by the Koran. > >Abd Al-Rahman Al-Sudayyis (Imam at the Grand Mosque in Mecca): “The scum of >the human race, the rats of the world, the violators of pacts and agreements, >the murderers of the prophets, and the offspring of apes and pigs [ are the >Jews].” > >Sheikh Saad al-Beraik (Saudia Arabia), “Muslim brothers in Palestine, do not >have any mercy neither compassion on the Jews, their blood, their money, their >flesh. Their women are yours to take, legitimately. God made them yours. Why >don’t you enslave their women? Why don’t you wage jihad? Why don’t you pillage >them?” > >The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem (2012): “our war with the descendants of the apes >and pigs [i.e. Jews] is a war of religion and faith… since Umar came and >continuing until the end of days, the reliable Hadith [of] Bukhari and Muslim >says: ‘The hour will not come until you fight the Jews. The Jew will hide >behind stones or trees, then the stones or trees will call: “Oh Muslim, >servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!” Except for the >Gharqad tree, therefore it is no wonder that you see gharqads surrounding the >settlements and colonies [of Jews].” >Note: Caliph Umar captured Jerusalem in 637 A.D. > >Hazem Shuman (Egypt), 2012: [After castigating Egyptians for not fighting >Jews, assuring Jews that all 85 million Egyptians hate them and want them >dead, he finishes with] “Jews are a cancer. These Jews are a catastrophe. >There is not a catastrophe in the world that is not the handiwork of the Jews. >These Jews are a cancer in the body of planet Earth, and if permitted, it will >spread and infect the entire body. Getting rid of these Jews is a must.” > >Other “interesting” quotes. > >Imam Muhammad Hassan (Egypt): “We are talking about the principles of the >shari’a. The truth is that democracy in the Western sense is for the people to >rule itself in disregard for the law of Allah, and this I do not accept.” >Comment: In other words the only form of ‘democracy’ permissible under Islam >is one that conforms to Sharia Law, a-la Iran. > >Sheik Nasr Farid Wassel (Egypt): “The martyr Bin Laden, Allah’s mercy upon >him, waged Jihad for the sake of Allah against the Soviets and against >America…There was a call at the Al-Nour Mosque to pray for the soul of Bin >Laden since he is a martyr. But I said that we were forbidden to pray for the >soul of a martyr and that Bin Laden lives on. He is not dead. “Do not consider >those who were killed for the sake of Allah to be dead. They live on, >sustained by their Lord.”” >Comment: And I thought that (some of) the mosques weren’t praying for OBL >because they did not agree with his actions. Oh silly me! > >Shaykh ‘Abd-al-’Azim (Egypt): I want to say that democracy is a bad idea. We >should not feel ashamed to say it. It is a bad, backward, and retarded idea, >which is taken from Greece. Democracy is spoken of like it’s a modern >discovery, but it’s not. Even the freedoms, what are they? Among the freedoms >inherent in the democratic system are freedom for women, freedom of ownership, >freedom of homosexuality, personal freedom, freedom of conscience and >expression,freedom to disbelieve in the Creator of Heaven and Earth. There’s >mixing (of men and women), usury, all of this is in democracy, which is why I >condemn it. >Comment: In Islam, therefore, there is no freedom for women, personal freedom, >freedom of speech or religion etc. > >Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed: “Islam allows me to take the benefits the system >offers. I’m fully eligible. It is very difficult for me to get a job. Anyway, >most of the leadership of the Islamic movement is on [state] benefit.’” >Comment: nice to know he was not adverse to getting hand-outs from the Kaffir >he hated and despised. Also note that he and most of the Islamist leadership >is unemployable – I wonder why? > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > >
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Post message: prole...@egroups.com Subscribe : proletar-subscr...@egroups.com Unsubscribe : proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com List owner : proletar-ow...@egroups.com Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
