Kalau penyebab elo doyan selangkangan juga cuman satu kan tem? Surat 23 di kitab elo itu
Bener gak tem? Atau surat laen nih? -----Original Message----- From: item abu <item...@yahoo.com> Sender: proletar@yahoogroups.com Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:57:06 To: proletar@yahoogroups.com<proletar@yahoogroups.com> Reply-To: proletar@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [proletar] America Falling Behind in Space Race and Innovation Mungkin akan ada yg pake alasan bhw mereka ras yg berbeda atau memang kondisi geografisnya berbeda shg membuat kelakuan orangnya berbeda. Tp lihat kasus India dan Pakistan yg rasnya sama dan berasal dr satu negara yg sama. Pakistan jauh lebih melarat dan terbelakang dr India, kalo ga dpt duit dr Amrik, Pakistan udah akan jadi lebih parah lagi. Penyebabnya cuma satu, yaitu agama laknatan lil alamin itulah yg membuat penjilat pantat Arab menjadi miskin, dungu dan biadab. Contoh yg lebih spesifik lagi, di India, orang Islam itu jg lebih miskin dr non Islam, tp lbh biadab. Ini ngasih bukti lagi bhw Islam itu memang ajaran laknatan lil alamin yg membuat pengikutnya menjadi miskin, tolol dan biadab. >________________________________ >From: Sunny <am...@tele2.se> >To: proletar@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 3:29 PM >Subject: Re: [proletar] America Falling Behind in Space Race and Innovation > > > >RRC atau RRT itu boleh dibilang sama waktu berdirinya dengan NKRI, tetapi >mengapa NKRI yang berpaham firman Allah tidak mencapai kemajuan seperti >mereka? Apakah itu suatu takdir harus begitu? > >From: suryana >Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 11:08 PM >To: tionghoa-...@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [proletar] America Falling Behind in Space Race and Innovation > >RRC sudah masuk ke bidang antariksa, dan tanpa gembar gembor sudah mendarat >dibulan. >Bila Amerika menghabiskan dollarnya untuk menjadi polisi dunia, RRC mah >anteng saja dengan program program yg memang sudah dibuat puluhan tahun >lalu, dan dijalankan sesuai dengan rencana matang. > >Bila Amerika dollarnya habis utk men 'demokrasi' kan banyak negara dengan >cara cowboy, ternyata tidak semua negara menerima dengan begitu saja. > >Hitech utk peralatan ke luar angkasa, bukanlah semata mata hitech, sama >halnya juga dengan peralatan perang, dimana kedua hal tsb pada akhirnya >menjadi produk untuk umum, semisal satelit bila diawal hanya utk keperluan >keamanan, saat ini satelit bertebaran di angkasa, dan masih untung angkasa >nya luas biarpun utk posisi satelit umumnya tetap digaris tengah/katulistiwa >yg paling optimal, sampah satelit belum menjadi momok. > >Apakah nantinya akan terjadi perang dingin diantara Amerika dan RRC, aku >perkirakan tidak akan terjadi karena perang sekarang bukan perang dingin >maupun perang panas, melainkan perang harga diri. > >Untung Indonesia masih memiliki Gatot Kaca alias Jabang Tutuka, dan punya >senjata pemusnah massal panah cakra dan kentut Semar, tanpa itu semua >Indonesia sudah dibuang dari negara bagian Amerika yg ke 52. > >sur. >+++ > >by Karl Rusnak on October 22, 2011 - 2:08pm >While America struggles to figure out what vehicle will replace the space >shuttle, China is racing ahead to build its first space station: a potential >jumping off point for deeper space missions and a center for scientific >research. Meanwhile Americans are dependent on other countries for access to >the international space station. > >Fear is growing among some Americans that China may take ownership of the >moon. The notion may sound ridiculous, but with America’s space program in >shambles while other nations build their programs up, America may lag behind >in the race to dominate space and technology. > >Up until recent years, America had been at the forefront of space >exploration. After leapfrogging Russia in the space race, we were the first >to put a man on the moon, and had a consistent presence in space through the >shuttle program. But with the space shuttles now retired, America seems to >have lost its edge in space. > >Commercial space entrepreneur Robert Bigelow told an audience at the >International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight that America >is falling behind in the space race. > >"Americans are still basking in the lunar glory from 40 years ago," Bigelow >said. "But we don’t own one square foot of the damn place. NASA is a shadow >of the space agency it once was in the 1960s and 1970s. > >While the United States struggles with debt and calls for austerity from the >right, China is flush with cash, has growing technological knowledge and has >the will to move forward with space exploration. In response, Bigelow is >calling for the U.S. to put just 1/10th of the money spent on the wars in >Iraq and Afghanistan toward space exploration instead. > >"America would experience a rebirth of vision, excitement, science and >global prestige," Bigelow said. > >With the U.S. slipping from its position of economic power, this injection >of energy and national pride could be very beneficial, and would certainly >be more productive than spending it on unwinnable wars. > >The space program brings with it unparalleled innovation in high tech >fields, and if we invest in that and ensure our domestic industries are >protected, we can begin to rebuild our economic strength. The space program >may seem trivial to some, but it goes hand in hand with being an economic >leader. > >by Karl Rusnak on October 22, 2011 - 2:08pm >While America struggles to figure out what vehicle will replace the space >shuttle, China is racing ahead to build its first space station: a potential >jumping off point for deeper space missions and a center for scientific >research. Meanwhile Americans are dependent on other countries for access to >the international space station. > >Fear is growing among some Americans that China may take ownership of the >moon. The notion may sound ridiculous, but with America’s space program in >shambles while other nations build their programs up, America may lag behind >in the race to dominate space and technology. > >Up until recent years, America had been at the forefront of space >exploration. After leapfrogging Russia in the space race, we were the first >to put a man on the moon, and had a consistent presence in space through the >shuttle program. But with the space shuttles now retired, America seems to >have lost its edge in space. > >Commercial space entrepreneur Robert Bigelow told an audience at the >International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight that America >is falling behind in the space race. > >"Americans are still basking in the lunar glory from 40 years ago," Bigelow >said. "But we don’t own one square foot of the damn place. NASA is a shadow >of the space agency it once was in the 1960s and 1970s. > >While the United States struggles with debt and calls for austerity from the >right, China is flush with cash, has growing technological knowledge and has >the will to move forward with space exploration. In response, Bigelow is >calling for the U.S. to put just 1/10th of the money spent on the wars in >Iraq and Afghanistan toward space exploration instead. > >"America would experience a rebirth of vision, excitement, science and >global prestige," Bigelow said. > >With the U.S. slipping from its position of economic power, this injection >of energy and national pride could be very beneficial, and would certainly >be more productive than spending it on unwinnable wars. > >The space program brings with it unparalleled innovation in high tech >fields, and if we invest in that and ensure our domestic industries are >protected, we can begin to rebuild our economic strength. The space program >may seem trivial to some, but it goes hand in hand with being an economic >leader. > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Post message: prole...@egroups.com Subscribe : proletar-subscr...@egroups.com Unsubscribe : proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com List owner : proletar-ow...@egroups.com Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
