Saya menulis: m

"Membunuh manusia itu salah.

Titik."

Lalu Abbas Amin menulis:

"Dan kamu megharapkan kemusnahan umat Islam sedunia; alangkah biadabnya kamu ! 
Berarti juga seluruh anti Islam, biadab !"

Nggak salah lagi dah.

Abbas Amin jelas sudah nggak waras.

Abbas Amin jelas sudah gila pula..

--- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, "Abbas" <abas_amin08@...> wrote:
>
> Dan kamu megharapkan kemusnahan umat Islam sedunia; alangkah biadabnya kamu ! 
> Berarti juga seluruh anti Islam, biadab !
> 
> --- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, "Bukan Pedanda" <bukan.pedanda@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Membunuh manusia itu salah.
> > 
> > Titik.
> >  
> > 
> > --- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, "Abbas" <abas_amin08@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Kalau tak ada alasan yang jelas yaa bajingan lah.
> > > 
> > > --- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, item abu <itemabu@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Kalo orang Sunni ngebantai orang Ahmadiyah itu bajingan apa kagak?
> > > > 
> > > > Kalo orang Sunni ngebantai non muslim, bajingan apa kagak?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >________________________________
> > > > > From: Abbas <abas_amin08@>
> > > > >To: proletar@yahoogroups.com 
> > > > >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 12:02 PM
> > > > >Subject: [proletar] Re: Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies Islamic 
> > > > >"Pleasure Marriages"
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > >  
> > > > >Orang Sunni ngebantai orang Shiah bajingan
> > > > >Orang Shiah ngebntai orng Sunni jug bjingn !
> > > > >Inilah pernyataan RESMI dari Abbas Amien
> > > > >
> > > > >--- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, item abu <itemabu@> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Ni orang dungunya minta ampun. Kalo gua bikin pernyataan, apanya yg 
> > > > >> perlu gua jawab?
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Tp kayaknya sih si Abbas Amin bilang bhw orang Shia itu bukan orang 
> > > > >> Islam, maka orang Islam Sunni yg ngebunuh orang Shia ga dianggap sbg 
> > > > >> bajingan oleh Abbas Amin, sebaliknya orang Shia yg ngebunuh orang 
> > > > >> Sunni adalah bajingan.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Hehehe... akhirnya Abbas Amin ngasih pencerahan.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> >________________________________
> > > > >> > From: Abbas <abas_amin08@>
> > > > >> >To: proletar@yahoogroups.com 
> > > > >> >Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 11:11 AM
> > > > >> >Subject: [proletar] Re: Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies 
> > > > >> >Islamic "Pleasure Marriages"
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >  
> > > > >> >Pernyataan yng sudah dijawab sendiri oleh si Debil ! Dasar si Debil 
> > > > >> >memang bak anjing kena rabies, yng menggonggong salh waktu !
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >--- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, item abu <itemabu@> wrote:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Jadi kalo orang Sunni ngebantai orang Shia, maka orang Sunni ga 
> > > > >> >> akan dianggap sbg bajingan oleh Abbas Amin.
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> Sebaliknya kalo orang Shia ngebantai orang Sunni, maka si orang 
> > > > >> >> Shia akan dianggap sbg bajingan oleh Abbas Amin.
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> Tentunya si habe akan ngedukung si Abbas Amin, hehehe...
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> >________________________________
> > > > >> >> > From: Bukan Pedanda <bukan.pedanda@>
> > > > >> >> >To: proletar@yahoogroups.com 
> > > > >> >> >Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 10:31 AM
> > > > >> >> >Subject: [proletar] Re: Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies 
> > > > >> >> >Islamic "Pleasure Marriages"
> > > > >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >  
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >Ah, syiah itu bukan Islam...
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >--- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, "Abbas" <abas_amin08@> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >> Siapa bilang itu sesuai dengan ajaran Islam !? Itu cocoknya 
> > > > >> >> >> dengan ajaran SYIAH, tahu ?!
> > > > >> >> >> 
> > > > >> >> >> --- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, item abu <itemabu@> wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >> > Hehehe... cuma Islam yg bisa ngasih solusi ke orang2 gila 
> > > > >> >> >> > sex gimana cara muasin nafsu gila sex orang2 tsb, bukan?
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > Apa beda pelacuran dgn kawin muta atau kawin Islami dgn 
> > > > >> >> >> > rencana bininya langsung akan diceraikan setelah puas? Kagak 
> > > > >> >> >> > ada, kecuali yg dua disebut belakangan itu sesuai dgn hukum 
> > > > >> >> >> > auloh dan ajaran Islam.
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > Islam itu emang agama yg benar unt para bajingan gila sex, 
> > > > >> >> >> > pedophile, tukang merkosa dll.
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > http://www.translatingjihad.com/2011/11/kuwaiti-shaykh-handful-of-dates-is.html
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > Tuesday, November 22, 2011 
> > > > >> >> >> > Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies Islamic "Pleasure 
> > > > >> >> >> > Marriages" 
> > > > >> >> >> > Posted by Translating Jihad
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqRfhlYQo2w&feature=player_embedded
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > Translated from video clip posted to YouTube, 17 July 2011
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > In the above video, Kuwaiti Shaykh Yasir al-Habib, a Shi'a, 
> > > > >> >> >> > explains and justifies the Islamic practice of zawaj 
> > > > >> >> >> > al-mut'a, or temporary marriage (lit. 'pleasure marriage'), 
> > > > >> >> >> > which is in a sense 
> > > > >> >> >> > Islamically-sanctioned prostitution. In the longer clip 
> > > > >> >> >> > which I took 
> > > > >> >> >> > this excerpted portion from, Shaykh al-Habib starts out by 
> > > > >> >> >> > saying that 
> > > > >> >> >> > Sunnis often try to embarrass Shi'a by saying that they're 
> > > > >> >> >> > going to 
> > > > >> >> >> > marry their sisters in a pleasure marriage.
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > Al-Habib responds by saying that, first of all, in Islam a 
> > > > >> >> >> > brother has 
> > > > >> >> >> > no authority over the actions of his sister. And secondly, 
> > > > >> >> >> > he contends 
> > > > >> >> >> > that Sunnis want him to deny pleasure marriage simply 
> > > > >> >> >> > because some 
> > > > >> >> >> > people find it repulsive, to which he counters that "the 
> > > > >> >> >> > Messenger of 
> > > > >> >> >> > Allah didn't find it repulsive." Then he turns the argument 
> > > > >> >> >> > around, 
> > > > >> >> >> > explaining that Sunnis attempt to deny pleasure marriage 
> > > > >> >> >> > while accepting
> > > > >> >> >> >  marriage with the intent to divorce, which is essentially 
> > > > >> >> >> > the same 
> > > > >> >> >> > thing.
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > He also brings up a hadith or saying from one of the 
> > > > >> >> >> > companions of 
> > > > >> >> >> > Muhammad, who said that, "We contracted temporary marriage 
> > > > >> >> >> > giving a 
> > > > >> >> >> > handful of the dates or flour as a dower during the life 
> > > > >> >> >> > time of Allah's
> > > > >> >> >> >  Messenger (may peace be upon him) and during the time of 
> > > > >> >> >> > Abu Bakr until
> > > > >> >> >> >  Umar forbade it because of Amr Ibn Huraith" (from 
> > > > >> >> >> > al-islam.org). The last point about Umar forbidding it is 
> > > > >> >> >> > where most Shi'a and Sunnis 
> > > > >> >> >> > disagree--the Shi'a don't accept Umar as a legitimate caliph 
> > > > >> >> >> > or 
> > > > >> >> >> > successor to Muhammad, while the Sunnis do.
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > Subtitled video is above, transcript below (h/t Nonie 
> > > > >> >> >> > Darwish):
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > I tell him, “Come on, if you’re a man, then give me your 
> > > > >> >> >> > sister in 
> > > > >> >> >> > marriage, a marriage with the intent of divorcing after one 
> > > > >> >> >> > night.” I 
> > > > >> >> >> > could imagine something like that, now that you mention it. 
> > > > >> >> >> > You know? 
> > > > >> >> >> > Now, even if you find this repulsive, the Messenger of Allah 
> > > > >> >> >> > didn’t find it repulsive. The Messenger of Allah approved 
> > > > >> >> >> > this marriage by 
> > > > >> >> >> > recognizing it. The Messenger of Allah permitted and 
> > > > >> >> >> > authorized 
> > > > >> >> >> > (temporary) pleasure marriages. Now even if they later put 
> > > > >> >> >> > it in a 
> > > > >> >> >> > written hadith that he later forbade pleasure marriages, the 
> > > > >> >> >> > important 
> > > > >> >> >> > thing is that it was present (during the time of the 
> > > > >> >> >> > Prophet).
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > >If the marriage was by nature considered repulsive by the 
> > > > >> >> >> > >Shari’ah, 
> > > > >> >> >> > meaning it was not pleasing to Almighty Allah and His 
> > > > >> >> >> > Messenger (PBUH), 
> > > > >> >> >> > then the Prophet from the beginning would not have permitted 
> > > > >> >> >> > it. Why did
> > > > >> >> >> >  he permit it? I mean, it wasn’t considered contrary to 
> > > > >> >> >> > the honor of 
> > > > >> >> >> > Muslim women. Why did he authorize his companions to marry 
> > > > >> >> >> > Muslim women 
> > > > >> >> >> > for a short time, and to “enjoy them (sexually),” 
> > > > >> >> >> > [Qur’an 4:24] even 
> > > > >> >> >> > with a handful of dates? A handful of dates is given to any 
> > > > >> >> >> > woman to 
> > > > >> >> >> > enjoy her sexually, that’s it. If you say that this is 
> > > > >> >> >> > adultery, then 
> > > > >> >> >> > you’re accusing the Messenger (PBUH) of adultery, or that 
> > > > >> >> >> > he legitimized
> > > > >> >> >> >  adultery. If you say this is repulsive, you’re accusing 
> > > > >> >> >> > the Messenger 
> > > > >> >> >> > (PBUH) of being repulsive, or that the Messenger of Allah 
> > > > >> >> >> > legitimized 
> > > > >> >> >> > that which is repulsive, Allah forbid. Is it not so?
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > >Pleasure marriage came to solve a societal problem. It 
> > > > >> >> >> > >doesn’t mean that
> > > > >> >> >> >  it always has to be applied. However, if my sister did 
> > > > >> >> >> > that, according 
> > > > >> >> >> > to its rules and laws, whether she were a widow and her 
> > > > >> >> >> > husband had 
> > > > >> >> >> > passed away, or she were divorced, and so forth; if she 
> > > > >> >> >> > needed it (for 
> > > > >> >> >> > whatever reason), then this marriage would be according to 
> > > > >> >> >> > the tradition
> > > > >> >> >> >  (sunnah) of Allah and His Messenger (PBUH). There is no 
> > > > >> >> >> > shame in this. 
> > > > >> >> >> > No shame at all.
> > > > >> >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >>
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > Tidak ada alasn
> >
>




------------------------------------

Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe   :  proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe :  proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner  :  proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to