On 11.03.20 23:58, Sylvain Rabot wrote: > Several maintainers have given their thoughts on the subjects now. > > What would be the next step ? > > Should this be put to a vote ?
We could. My personal opinion is that if somebody commits to do the work of changing our build processes to not use/have the `vendor` directory, I'd be for it. However, from the mail conversation and also from some personal communication I had with a few team members, there are many who don't really want to change the status quo right now, and some even prefer to keep the `vendor` directory around. Since the current state doesn't really block any other feature development, and since the appetite for change doesn't seem to be very high generally, I would say this is not super pressing at the moment, and I wouldn't spin up the machinery of a formal vote for it right now. It might, however, be a great topic to discuss at the next developer summit. I have already added it to the agenda. (It was planned to happen during KubeCon EU. Since the latter has been postponed, we might do a virtual summit, but that's not finalized yet.) -- Björn Rabenstein [PGP-ID] 0x851C3DA17D748D03 [email] bjo...@rabenste.in -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to prometheus-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/20200312164200.GY14683%40jahnn.
