On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 21:00, Albert Serrallé <albertredn...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> That's how is usually done in my company (and I suspect that's very
> prevalent but *wrong* in the end, if I understand that link correctly).
> In my company, at team level we have a lot of metrics scraped into a single
> prometheus. Then, at company level we just "replicate" everything with the
> corresponding team label.
>

Yes, that would not be the recommended way to do things. It's more complex,
less reliable, and less performant.


> The *official* recommendation would be to create aggregation rules in the
> "team" prometheus, and federate that from the "company" prometheus, right?
>

Only if there's an aggregation that makes sense, which is probably not the
case for CloudWatch - and you'd still mess up the timestamps.

Brian



>
> On Wednesday, 1 April 2020 21:42:20 UTC+2, Brian Brazil wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 20:11, Albert Serrallé <albert...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to figure out how to federate my cloudwatch_exporter metrics.
>>>
>>> The default metrics are 10m old, I understand that this is needed
>>> because cloudwatch consolidate metrics over time. My prometheus is scraping
>>> the exporter and saving the values with the original timestamp. Federation
>>> queries (as they are instant queries) cannot retrieve those metrics.
>>>
>>> So, I think that my only options are:
>>>
>>>    - set_timestamp -> false (fake illusion of real time metric, which
>>>    are really 10m old)
>>>    - delay_seconds -> 1s-5m (metric might not be consolidated in
>>>    cloudwatch)
>>>
>>> There's anything else I can try? I don't like any of those two methods
>>> for the exposed reasons. I've been looking at the changes in stale logic
>>> for 2.0, but I don't know if this applies to me or how to do it:
>>>
>>> If you're federating instance-level metrics, switch to only aggregated
>>>> metrics
>>>>
>>>
>>> So, what's the recommended way to overcome this?
>>>
>>
>> You can't with federation, it's merely a more obvious case where
>> instance-level metrics don't work. See
>> https://www.robustperception.io/federation-what-is-it-good-for
>>
>> In this case if you need the metrics in a different Prometheus, get that
>> Prometheus to scrape the cloudwatch exporter.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Many thanks.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Prometheus Users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to promethe...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/030245a2-9e9e-4493-9a39-eebf53753e47%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/030245a2-9e9e-4493-9a39-eebf53753e47%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Brian Brazil
>> www.robustperception.io
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prometheus Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to prometheus-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/f03663b6-1dba-4930-a016-077a2328745c%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/f03663b6-1dba-4930-a016-077a2328745c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
Brian Brazil
www.robustperception.io

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to prometheus-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CAHJKeLq1W90G%2Bnf0mFrkVG2EKfKseHF5Jo6XiVEw2Tu8JHOEEw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to