On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:26 AM Brian Brazil < brian.bra...@robustperception.io> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 10:10, Julius Volz <julius.v...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:01 AM Brian Brazil < >> brian.bra...@robustperception.io> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 09:25, Ben Kochie <sup...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the link to the other survey. That's pretty good. >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:27 PM 'Tom Lee' via Prometheus Users < >>>> prometheus-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Richard, >>>>> >>>>> Reading between the lines it sounds like we're *potentially* talking >>>>> about a broader/larger "State of Clojure >>>>> <https://clojure.org/news/2020/02/20/state-of-clojure-2020>" >>>>> type thing for Prometheus. Is that accurate? >>>>> >>>>> Certainly don't mind the results being public. My only real concern is >>>>> timelines: we were hoping to use some of the raw data to help advise some >>>>> load testing on our end, and things are already looking pretty aggressive. >>>>> If we're looking at something that's going to take weeks or more to start >>>>> seeing results rolling in we probably won't quite get the data we were >>>>> hoping to get in time. From a purely selfish perspective we'd be pretty >>>>> disappointed to go forward without data from "the source", so to speak. Of >>>>> course, I totally understand the team's actions here. I'm just whining to >>>>> myself. >>>>> >>>>> Timelines aside, we'd be excited to see something "official" in the >>>>> longer term. It would be useful for engineers like myself, and I know >>>>> there >>>>> are product managers and research folks lurking our virtual halls who >>>>> would >>>>> love such readily available data for future efforts. >>>>> >>>>> The questions from our survey: >>>>> >>>>> - Roughly how many Prometheus *servers* are you operationally >>>>> responsible for? >>>>> - Of all the Prometheus servers that you are responsible for, >>>>> which version would you say is the most widely deployed? >>>>> >>>>> The first two questions are good. I might modify the first one to >>>> clarify with/without HA. For example, we have 21 Prometheus servers, but 7 >>>> of those are duplicates for HA. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> - How many unique metrics are reporting across all of your >>>>> Prometheus servers? >>>>> - How many unique *timeseries* are reporting across all of your >>>>> Prometheus servers? >>>>> >>>>> These two need to be clarified for Prometheus. We tend to use the >>>> terms metrics and time-series interchangeably. Are you asking about unique >>>> metric names? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> - If you use Grafana to visualize your Prometheus data, what >>>>> version of Grafana do you typically use? >>>>> - What value do you typically use for the "scrape_interval" config >>>>> setting in your Prometheus servers? >>>>> - Is there anything else you would like to tell us about your >>>>> Prometheus deployment(s)? For example, interesting challenges, pain >>>>> points, >>>>> or quirks of your configuration? >>>>> >>>>> I have a few additional questions that could be added to the list. >>>> >>>> * How many unique exporter/target types do you have? >>>> * What is your samples/second ingestion rate across all Prometheus >>>> servers? >>>> * What is your general metric retention time? >>>> * Do you use external storage (Federation/remote_write/etc) >>>> >>> * If yes, which external storage system(s)? >>>> >>> >>> I'd be also interested in what versions of Java/Python are in use, and >>> in particular what are the oldest JVM versions that users are using the >>> jmx_exporter with. >>> >> >> If we're getting that specific I'd be worried there'd be a lot of other >> questions in that specificity category. But if it's only these couple it >> would be fine. >> > > I don't see how this is much different in terms of specificity as some of > the other proposed questions. > > These are things I want to know as the Java/Python maintainer, as we > currently support some rather old versions of these runtimes. It'd be good > to know if it's e.g. safe to drop Python 2.6 support. > Fine with me if you want to add these to the doc. I do think they're more specific in that they're less about the high-level deployment stats, and relevant for a smaller number of users. > Brian > > >> >> >>> Brian >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Look forward to whatever might eventuate here, those big community >>>>> surveys are always a lot of fun to read through. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Tom >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:25 AM Richard Hartmann < >>>>> richih.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Tom, >>>>>> >>>>>> after some internal deliberation, we think it would be unfair to give >>>>>> any single survey our official blessing, and running more than once >>>>>> every, say, year seems to be too much for users, too. On the other >>>>>> hand, user surveys make sense for everyone. >>>>>> >>>>>> Would you be OK with sending your questions to >>>>>> prometheus-t...@googlegroups.com or as a reply in this thread? We >>>>>> would then publish them for comments/feedback and run the survey under >>>>>> the Prometheus umbrella, sharing replies publicly. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Richard >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:44 PM 'Tom Lee' via Prometheus Users >>>>>> <prometheus-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Understood Julius, appreciate the transparency. Thank you! >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:37 PM Julius Volz < >>>>>> julius.v...@promlabs.com> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Hi Tom, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Thanks for checking in first! We're currently discussing within >>>>>> the Prometheus Team how we would prefer to handle such requests in >>>>>> general >>>>>> (so that things remain fair between companies, etc.) and will get back to >>>>>> you as soon. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Regards, >>>>>> >> Julius >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:21 PM 'Tom Lee' via Prometheus Users < >>>>>> prometheus-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Hi folks, >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Full disclosure: I'm an engineer from New Relic ( >>>>>> https://newrelic.com/). We've been looking into improving our open >>>>>> source monitoring story and Prometheus is a key piece of that. Right now, >>>>>> though, there are some pieces of the puzzle that we can't easily dig into >>>>>> without more input from the Prometheus community at large. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Is this mailing list an okay place to send a Google Forms type >>>>>> survey with maybe half a dozen questions? And if not, can folks suggest >>>>>> somewhere that might be more appropriate? >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>> Tom >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> -- >>>>>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>> Google Groups "Prometheus Users" group. >>>>>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to prometheus-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/b48e651a-b264-4ade-8eb8-7dc7eec11b15%40googlegroups.com >>>>>> . >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> -- >>>>>> >> Julius Volz >>>>>> >> PromLabs - promlabs.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> > -- >>>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Prometheus Users" group. >>>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to prometheus-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CAMUmz5j6aqwyJ8aDmFvggkD%2BeTpMMLzM0zTp1kXgnFP%2Bd%3Dw5fQ%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Richard >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Prometheus Users" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to prometheus-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CAMUmz5gNNk4naMFLJ_cWQJQO5g1pGVTZnn74FF4PV%3DHOmhpTqw%40mail.gmail.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CAMUmz5gNNk4naMFLJ_cWQJQO5g1pGVTZnn74FF4PV%3DHOmhpTqw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Prometheus Users" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to prometheus-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CABbyFmqGobiq7NUF-jzqGXOphhG8JjYrb%3D19C5Sm6W5CctmquA%40mail.gmail.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CABbyFmqGobiq7NUF-jzqGXOphhG8JjYrb%3D19C5Sm6W5CctmquA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Brian Brazil >>> www.robustperception.io >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Prometheus Users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to prometheus-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CAHJKeLpMkTe0LU_MiTEe9BgDCDAtQ7BCVaiXtjPRzoQ4FO1WTA%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CAHJKeLpMkTe0LU_MiTEe9BgDCDAtQ7BCVaiXtjPRzoQ4FO1WTA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> > > -- > Brian Brazil > www.robustperception.io > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prometheus Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to prometheus-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/CA%2BT6Yox54R_Xgj6-4655KFuAWJXTPWVJPfED9ELCg0ZYZJFCKA%40mail.gmail.com.
