> 3) Lower case and underscore are accepted as parts of a name by most tools. > On the other hand, both "*" and "-" are operators in many languages.
that was my fear, but what about the "/" as brian suggested i think i like that one best Dennis Saputelli Joey Nelson wrote: > > Dennis, > > I've gone with the convention of RW_n for the following reasons: > > 1) Some tools (Protel Schematic -> PCB) loose case. Occasionally I'm left > thinking what the heck some NOBCLP or whatever signal is, especially bad > when the preceding N makes a meaningful word: nAP becomes NAP. > > 2) I do a fair amount of verilog code along with my PCB designs, and I want > my names to be as similar as > possible between the designs. In verilog, I use the convention that all > signals are lower case with underscore to separate words. In Protel I > follow the same convention just with all caps. > > 3) Lower case and underscore are accepted as parts of a name by most tools. > On the other hand, both "*" and "-" are operators in many languages. > > Joey Nelson > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dennis Saputelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:58 AM > Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux > > > I know this has been widely discussed but ... > > > > re: > > pin naming on schematic symbols and the negation character thereof > > > > what was the consensus, or was there? > > i know the bar symbol is problematic and i have decided to never use it > > again > > > > i recall someone advocating the use of "n" as in nRW > > that doesn't look too bad but what about "*" or "-" > > > > i was scared to use those without some advice that those characters were > > not problematic > > (sometimes this sort of thing doesn't bite you until late in the game) > > > > as a functional issue i guess this question is probably more importantly > > applied to net labels than schem pin names > > but i think they should be done consistently > > > > Dennis Saputelli > > > > -- > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > www.integratedcontrolsinc.com Integrated Controls, Inc. > > tel: 415-647-0480 2851 21st Street > > fax: 415-647-3003 San Francisco, CA 94110 > > -- ___________________________________________________________________________ www.integratedcontrolsinc.com Integrated Controls, Inc. tel: 415-647-0480 2851 21st Street fax: 415-647-3003 San Francisco, CA 94110 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *