We use a "#" after the signal name ala the PCI specification (GNT#, REQ#, etc.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Cliff Gerhard, P.E. E-M Designs, Inc. PH 949.661.3016 x 501 www.gerhardeng.com www.emdesigns.com www.emmanufacturing.com -----Original Message----- From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:58 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux I know this has been widely discussed but ... re: pin naming on schematic symbols and the negation character thereof what was the consensus, or was there? i know the bar symbol is problematic and i have decided to never use it again i recall someone advocating the use of "n" as in nRW that doesn't look too bad but what about "*" or "-" i was scared to use those without some advice that those characters were not problematic (sometimes this sort of thing doesn't bite you until late in the game) as a functional issue i guess this question is probably more importantly applied to net labels than schem pin names but i think they should be done consistently Dennis Saputelli -- ___________________________________________________________________________ www.integratedcontrolsinc.com Integrated Controls, Inc. tel: 415-647-0480 2851 21st Street fax: 415-647-3003 San Francisco, CA 94110 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
