> DRC would be happy, but a properly configured ERC would not. I always have > ERC report unconnected pins, and I nail them all down: if there is a > deliberately unconnected pin, I place a No-ERC directive on it, which from > then on suppresses the ERC report.
That's what I do too. It's not just for Protel's sake, it's for my sake too. The no-erc symbol tells me that I have thought about that pin and decided to leave it unconnected. Otherwise I could be looking at the schematic later, not remember why I left the pin unconnected, and think "I wonder if I missed that pin?..." Best regards, Ivan Baggett Bagotronix Inc. website: www.bagotronix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 5:39 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel 99SE ERC * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
