> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Common PCB footprint specifications
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John A. Ross [Design] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 10:00 AM
> > To: Protel EDA Forum
> > Subject: Re: [PEDA] Common PCB footprint specifications
> > 
> > If Protel could assign a different footprint for rotation, or side, 
> > based on some sort of logical system, then it would make 
> life so much 
> > easier to define DFM rules even at SCH level.
> > Perhaps that's worth a new feature request on the DXP forum :)
> 
> FYI, PCAD has this feature and it seems to work quite well.  
> As PCAD moves toward DXP (as I assume it will) I'd be 
> surprised if it didn't show up in DXP.  

Gary

I was used to this feature before in Ultimate (now EWB) from a long time
ago, and missed it very much

I was looking at PCAD a while back but as I have just upgraded another seat
of P99SE to DXP Ill press on with it for now and see what I can do to push
for such features in future SP's. I would think such features would be a
popular addition for most people. 

Best Regards

John A. Ross

RSD Communications Ltd
8 BorrowMeadow Road
Springkerse Industrial Estate
Stirling, Scotland FK7 7UW

Tel     +44 [0]1786 450572 Ext 225 (Office)
Tel     +44 [0]1786 450572 Ext 248 (Lab)
Fax     +44 [0]1786 474653
GSM     +44 [0]7831 373727

Email   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW     http://www.rsd.tv
==========================================
 
 
> 



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Forum Guidelines Rules:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reply via email to