Ian Wilson wrote: > > On 02:15 PM 16/07/2004, Dennis Saputelli said: > ><..snip..> > > > >BTW remember the To92's that were ECB ? (or was it BCE ?) > >just get out a bit of sleeving and your solder sucker and you > >were all set > >quite a bit harder to deal with in the case of SOTs though > > I have seem prototypes with SOT-23 upside-down with the gull-wing legs bent > to meet the board. It would have been done in a small production run > except reverse pinned versions were available. Worse think about this was > that another design done shortly after suffered the *same* problem - I > couldn't believe the lack of care and attention to detail.
same experience here we were once given a job to make a few minor changes to a pcb already designed NOT on the to-do list was to fix the SOT23's which were all wrong and which we discovered by carefully manually checking things that were not supposed to need checking when i pointed out this problem (and assuming i had it somehow wrong) they said 'yeah those boards didn't work' :} ds > > Ian > -- _______________________________________________________________________ Integrated Controls, Inc. Tel: 415-647-0480 EXT 107 2851 21st Street Fax: 415-647-3003 San Francisco, CA 94110 www.integratedcontrolsinc.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
