On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:01 PM, joel falcou <[email protected]> wrote: > Do people think such stuff (maybe in proto::tree:: or smthg ?) be useful > additions ?
Definitely. We're dealing with a compile-time AST, but this is still an AST and we often have to apply transformations to ASTs. Thus, having higher order metafunctions in Proto just asking us for the transform to apply on each node or somesuch, would be useful additions! -- Alp Mestanogullari http://alpmestan.wordpress.com/ http://alp.developpez.com/ _______________________________________________ proto mailing list [email protected] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
