On 7/27/2010 9:01 AM, joel falcou wrote: > what about having some Tree related trasnform/function/meta-function then ? > > I'm often thinking : "dang, this transform is basically a BFS for a node > verifying meta-function foo<>" > and have to rewrite a BFS usign default_ and such, which is relatively > easy. > > Now, sometimes it is "dang, this code is basically splitting an AST into > multiples AST everytime I found a bar tag" or "I need to do a DFS" > or even worse, I need to make the AST a DAG :E ... > > Do people think such stuff (maybe in proto::tree:: or smthg ?) be useful > additions ?
That would be awesome, Joel! -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ proto mailing list proto@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
