On 10/10/2011 1:52 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote: > On 10/10/2011 12:38 PM, Eric Niebler wrote: >> >> Bummer. I suggest adding an rvalue ref overload of operator%= that >> shares an implementation with the const lvalue one. Should just be a few >> lines of code. Is that a problem? > > Not really a problem. But, %= is just an example of the problems > (plural with an s). We suspect that it is more widespread. I'll > see how pervasive the changes need to be and get back to you.
Ok, adding the %= for rvalue refs for Qi and Karma fixed a lot of the failing tests. However, I am not sure how to fix the tests involving Lex (crashes on VC10 but OK on GCC). The compiler tutorial I am working on also got broken. I am not sure what else in the examples got broken. It's quite difficult to ascertain where the problem is because the code builds without errors but either crashes or does not work as expected at runtime. This is an insidious critter. Hartmut, I committed the fix for Qi and Karma. Can you please take a look at the Lex regressions? There's a good chance that the problem with the examples is also related to the Lex problem. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com _______________________________________________ proto mailing list proto@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto