On 10/11/2011 7:50 AM, Joel de Guzman wrote: > Everything's green now, Eric. The problem was not pervasive after > all; just a couple of fixes solved everything. > > There's no need to revert. It makes me wonder though if we've missed > something that will blow up in the future. I'll probably have to > scrutinize classes that use proto::extends and check for overloads.
Indeed, the symbols class blew up as soon as I added a test that gives it an rvalue parameter. Fixed now. > You might want to warn other proto users of this potential > breaking change. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com _______________________________________________ proto mailing list proto@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
