I think that protoc already has a compromise with pure compiler functionality - namely placing the java class in the package subfolder. Since you have so strong fillings not to make another compromise you probably will consider to remove the pervious one, or at least to make it optional?
________________________________ From: Kenton Varda [mailto:ken...@google.com] Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 4:17 PM To: George Georgiev Cc: Monty Taylor; Protocol Buffers Subject: Re: protoc feature question On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:25 PM, George Georgiev <georgi.georg...@citrix.com<mailto:georgi.georg...@citrix.com>> wrote: How exactly this will handle the problem with the different output files? It won't -- like I said, it's not what you were asking for. We're still saying that your issue is the responsibility of the build system. Sorry. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
