On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Wenbo Zhu <wen...@google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Pherl Liu <liuj...@google.com> wrote: > >> We also have another internal thread talking about the "restriction" >> support for protobuf. Basically we think the restriction or value validation >> function of protobuf should be implemented in the upper layer due to various >> concerns.. >> > Protobuf definition is different than schema for "documents". Constraints > may be specified externally or in the form of custom options. > > I wonder if there is any standard meta-schema language that could be > applied to both XML and non-XML data. UML is probably not a good choice > here. > > > >> >> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Marco Tedone <marco.ted...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm checking the protobuf language definition and I couldn't find >>> anywhere support for numeric range. In XSD, for instance, one could >>> have: >>> >>> <simpleType name="ZeroToTen"> >>> <restriction base="int"> >>> <minInclusive value="0" /> >>> <maxInclusive value="10" /> >>> </restriction> >>> </simpleType> >>> >>> However I couldn't find equivalent translation in the proto language >>> definition. I could find defaults and enums, but not number ranges. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Marco >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Protocol Buffers" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. >>> >>> >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
