Hi Alan, -----Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com> wrote: ----- > I plan to start working on a "go" <golang.org> binding for proton. I > envisage a SWIG binding similar to the other swig-based bindings > (python, ruby, etc.) and an API layer similar to the new reactive > Python API (based on the C reactor.) > > This will be an exploratory effort to begin with, I'd like to hear > from anybody who might be interested in using such a thing or helping > to implement it.
This is certainly something I'd be interested in. However, as far as I was aware, the usefulness of SWIG for Go was where you needed to wrapper C++ libraries. If you're just planning on wrapping the proton-c reactor code, wouldn't we simply use cgo [1]? Cheers, Dom [1] http://golang.org/cmd/cgo/Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU