----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robbie Gemmell" <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Cc: us...@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 10:20:07 AM
> Subject: Re: Python 3 port is 'done'
> 
> On 29 April 2015 at 21:05, Ken Giusti <kgiu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Well, done enough to consider merging to master.
> >
> > While the patch is quite large, most of the changes are simple syntax
> > changes to avoid non-python3 compliant syntax.
> >
> > The code is available on the kgiusti-python3 branch at the Apache repo.
> >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-proton.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kgiusti-python3
> >
> > I've also made a patch that can be viewed up on reviewboard:
> >
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/33691/
> >
> > I've verified that the unit tests and python examples run under python2.6,
> > 2.7, and python3.3.   I'd appreciate if folks would take this patch for a
> > spin and report back their experience.
> >
> > Known Issues:
> >
> > These changes will be incompatible with earlier versions of the python 2.x
> > series.  I know for a fact that python versions <= 2.4 won't even parse
> > this patch, and I suspect getting such older versions of python to work
> > would require lots of effort.   I'm a little unsure of how well python 2.5
> > will be supported - I have yet to test that far back.  I also didn't test
> > anything earlier than 3.3 in the python3.x stream.
> >
> > --
> > -K
> 
> I gave thigns a kick with Python 2.7, and Jython 2.5.3 without issue.
> 
> I also tried the maven build with Jython 2.7 RC3 (there was a new one)
> and things exploded similarly to the way they did before.
> 

Thanks Robbie.

What kind of issues does Jython 2.7 complain about?  I'll have to install that 
RC at some point... :(

> Robbie
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
> 
> 

-- 
-K

Reply via email to